From: Philip Martin <philip@codematters.co.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, piggin@cyberone.com.au
Subject: Re: 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 21:53:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87znbzg78o.fsf@codematters.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040203132913.6145f4e6.akpm@osdl.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:29:13 -0800")
Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> writes:
>> 2.6.1
>
> Odd. Are you really sure that it was the correct System.map?
I think so. I always build kernels using Debian's kernel-package so
both vmlinuz and System.map get placed into a .deb package as
vmlinuz-2.6.1 and System.map-2.6.1.
$ ls -l /boot/Sys*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 492205 Dec 1 19:27 /boot/System.map-2.4.23
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 492205 Jan 5 21:21 /boot/System.map-2.4.24
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 715800 Feb 1 21:02 /boot/System.map-2.6.1
$ ls -l /boot/vm*
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 880826 Dec 1 19:27 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.23
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 880822 Jan 5 21:21 /boot/vmlinuz-2.4.24
-rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1095040 Feb 1 21:02 /boot/vmlinuz-2.6.1
Hmm, I see that my 2.6.1 image is 25% bigger than 2.4.24, I'd not
noticed that before.
I have just tried another 2.6 profile run and got similar results.
248.88user 122.00system 3:41.18elapsed 167%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 0maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (453major+3770323minor)pagefaults 0swaps
c011e158 add_wait_queue 442 5.5250
c010b1e0 error_code 444 7.9286
c0114658 sched_clock 460 3.8333
c0108ac8 copy_thread 473 0.8631
c01229e0 wait_task_zombie 488 1.0252
c010a79c syscall_call 489 44.4545
c0127a1c del_timer_sync 529 4.0076
c0128d18 flush_signal_handlers 592 8.7059
c010c570 handle_IRQ_event 597 6.7841
c011fbe0 do_fork 606 1.5947
c0121970 put_files_struct 616 3.2083
c0123ec0 do_softirq 617 3.0245
c011add4 wake_up_forked_process 776 1.9020
c0110d1c old_mmap 868 2.6790
c012c638 sys_rt_sigaction 942 3.8607
c0122d78 sys_wait4 958 1.6404
c01168b8 flush_tlb_mm 1040 7.0270
c012b0a4 get_signal_to_deliver 1385 1.4610
c0123e38 current_kernel_time 1487 21.8676
c011afc8 schedule_tail 1606 8.9222
c01223e8 do_exit 1807 1.8514
c011df4f .text.lock.sched 2302 7.9654
c012b560 sys_rt_sigprocmask 2417 7.0262
c012c0a0 do_sigaction 2736 4.0473
c011e3c8 dup_task_struct 3034 22.3088
c011ec08 copy_files 3103 3.5261
c011de6c __preempt_spin_lock 3171 39.6375
c012b474 sigprocmask 3387 14.3517
c011c2e0 __wake_up 3699 48.6711
c0121d58 exit_notify 3780 2.2500
c0121150 release_task 4071 7.4288
c011694c flush_tlb_page 7069 44.1812
c011bbf0 schedule 7123 4.4519
c011e6d4 copy_mm 7826 7.5833
c010a770 system_call 8249 187.4773
c011efe0 copy_process 8760 2.8516
c0119588 pte_alloc_one 16097 251.5156
c01199b8 do_page_fault 44492 37.3255
c01086b0 default_idle 937243 18023.9038
00000000 total 1095569 6.7218
--
Philip Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-03 21:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-01 21:34 2.6.1 slower than 2.4, smp/scsi/sw-raid/reiserfs Philip Martin
2004-02-01 23:11 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-01 23:42 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-01 23:52 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-02 0:51 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-02 5:15 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-02 8:58 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-02 18:36 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-02 23:36 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-02 23:49 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-03 1:01 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-03 3:02 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-03 16:44 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-03 0:34 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-03 3:52 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-02 18:08 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-03 3:46 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-03 16:46 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-03 21:29 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-03 21:53 ` Philip Martin [this message]
2004-02-04 5:48 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-04 17:50 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-04 23:38 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-05 2:49 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-05 14:27 ` Philip Martin
2004-02-14 0:10 ` Philip Martin
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-03 6:55 Samium Gromoff
2004-02-03 7:07 ` Andrew Morton
2004-02-03 7:52 ` Samium Gromoff
2004-02-03 7:57 ` Nick Piggin
2004-02-03 15:58 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-02-03 7:13 ` Nick Piggin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87znbzg78o.fsf@codematters.co.uk \
--to=philip@codematters.co.uk \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=piggin@cyberone.com.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox