public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yunseong Kim <yskelg@gmail.com>
To: "Markus Elfring" <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	"Alexander Gordeev" <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Alexandra Winter" <wintera@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Christian Bornträger" <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Heiko Carstens" <hca@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Sven Schnelle" <svens@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Thorsten Winkler" <twinkler@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Vasily Gorbik" <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, MichelleJin <shjy180909@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] s390/netiucv: handle memory allocation failure in conn_action_start()
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 03:00:47 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <880a70f0-89d6-4094-8a71-a9c331bab1ee@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bb03a384-b2c4-438f-b36b-a4af33a95b60@web.de>

Hi Markus,

On 6/23/24 11:27 오후, Markus Elfring wrote:
>> This patch handle potential null pointer dereference in
>> iucv_path_connect(), When iucv_path_alloc() fails to allocate memory
>> for 'rc'.
> 
> 1. Can a wording approach (like the following) be a better change description?
> 
>    A null pointer is stored in the data structure member “path” after a call
>    of the function “iucv_path_alloc” failed. This pointer was passed to
>    a subsequent call of the function “iucv_path_connect” where an undesirable
>    dereference will be performed then.
>    Thus add a corresponding return value check.

Thank you very much for your detailed code review. I will thoughtfully
incorporate your advices into the next patch.

> 2. May the proposed error message be omitted
>    (because a memory allocation failure might have been reported
>    by an other function call already)?

I agree.

> 3. Is there a need to adjust the return type of the function “conn_action_start”?

I had the same thoughts while writing the code. Thank you!

> 4. Would you like to add any tags (like “Fixes”) accordingly?

Yes, I will refer to the mailing list and include the fix tag.

> 5. Under which circumstances will development interests grow for increasing
>    the application of scope-based resource management?
>    https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.10-rc4/source/include/linux/cleanup.h#L8

I am considering the environment in which the micro Virtual Machine
operates and testing the s390 architecture with QEMU on my Mac M2 PC.
I have been reviewing the code under the assumption of using a lot of
memory and having many micro Virtual Machines loaded simultaneously.

> Regards,
> Markus

I really appreciate code review Markus!


Best regards,

Yunseong Kim

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-24 18:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-23 13:11 [PATCH] s390/netiucv: handle memory allocation failure in conn_action_start() yskelg
2024-06-23 14:27 ` Markus Elfring
2024-06-24 18:00   ` Yunseong Kim [this message]
2024-06-25  9:08     ` Alexandra Winter
2024-06-25 15:08       ` Jakub Kicinski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=880a70f0-89d6-4094-8a71-a9c331bab1ee@gmail.com \
    --to=yskelg@gmail.com \
    --cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
    --cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=borntraeger@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=gor@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=hca@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=shjy180909@gmail.com \
    --cc=svens@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=twinkler@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=wintera@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox