From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86/nmi: Simplify unknown NMI panic handling
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 08:54:55 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88198f82-5a45-4a3d-af94-8ac1a4745b86@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d4b2b95-bb11-4d1f-8cba-0bcd8e864711@suse.com>
On 4/1/2025 8:00 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:
>> +#include <asm/realmode.h>
>> #include <asm/thermal.h>
>> #include <asm/unwind.h>
>> #include <asm/vsyscall.h>
>> -#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC)
>> -#include <asm/nmi.h>
>> -#endif
>
> As far as headers are concerned only this change falls under the
> "simplify nmi handling code" the others while nice cleanups should
> ideally be in a separate patch.
>
You are right. The simplification is only for the #ifdef. I could have
just removed the CONFIG check and left the rest of the headers as-is.
But the <linux/vmalloc.h> include there was completely out of place and
needed to be moved. This eventually led to the reshuffle.
I feel header reordering by itself may not be considered worthwhile as a
patch. Since this series is focussed on cleanups, I tried to keep
cleanups in the same vicinity together. It's mainly to avoid bloating
the patch count but still keep the reviewing of these changes manageable.
>>
>> /*
>> * max_low_pfn_mapped: highest directly mapped pfn < 4 GB
>> @@ -150,6 +147,13 @@ static size_t ima_kexec_buffer_size;
>> int bootloader_type, bootloader_version;
>>
>> static const struct ctl_table x86_sysctl_table[] = {
>> + {
>> + .procname = "unknown_nmi_panic",
>> + .data = &unknown_nmi_panic,
>> + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
>> + .mode = 0644,
>> + .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
>> + },
>> {
>> .procname = "panic_on_unrecovered_nmi",
>> .data = &panic_on_unrecovered_nmi,
>> @@ -185,15 +189,6 @@ static const struct ctl_table x86_sysctl_table[] = {
>> .mode = 0644,
>> .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
>> },
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC)
>> - {
>> - .procname = "unknown_nmi_panic",
>> - .data = &unknown_nmi_panic,
>> - .maxlen = sizeof(int),
>> - .mode = 0644,
>> - .proc_handler = proc_dointvec,
>> - },
>> -#endif
>
> Why move the definition and not just delete the #ifdef ?
>
Mainly for consistency. This keeps all the NMI panic options together in
x86_sysctl_table[].
>> #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP)
>> {
>> .procname = "acpi_video_flags",
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-01 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-27 23:46 [PATCH 0/9] x86: Cleanup NMI handling Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/nmi: Simplify unknown NMI panic handling Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 22:52 ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 23:01 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 15:00 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-04-01 15:54 ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/nmi: Consolidate NMI panic variables Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 22:43 ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 22:50 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:05 ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 23:20 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 1:06 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-01 5:46 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 8:08 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/nmi: Use a macro to initialize NMI descriptors Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:46 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/nmi: Remove export of local_touch_nmi() Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:47 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/nmi: Fix comment in unknown NMI handling Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 0:17 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-01 5:28 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 5:45 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-01 5:53 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Fix comment in unknown_nmi_error() tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/nmi: Improve and relocate NMI handler comments Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 1:03 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/nmi: Improve NMI header documentation Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 10:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-31 16:04 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 21:36 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 8:08 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-01 16:11 ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Add missing description x86_platform_ops::get_nmi_reason to <asm/x86_init.h> tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Improve <asm/nmi.h> documentation tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/nmi: Clean up NMI selftest Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/nmi: Improve NMI duration console print Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 0:42 ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33 ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Improve NMI duration console printouts tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 14:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] x86: Cleanup NMI handling Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-01 16:00 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-04-02 15:13 ` H. Peter Anvin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=88198f82-5a45-4a3d-af94-8ac1a4745b86@intel.com \
--to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xin@zytor.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox