public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sohil Mehta <sohil.mehta@intel.com>
To: Nikolay Borisov <nik.borisov@suse.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
	"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
	Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>,
	Kai Huang <kai.huang@intel.com>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>, Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/9] x86/nmi: Simplify unknown NMI panic handling
Date: Tue, 1 Apr 2025 08:54:55 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <88198f82-5a45-4a3d-af94-8ac1a4745b86@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5d4b2b95-bb11-4d1f-8cba-0bcd8e864711@suse.com>

On 4/1/2025 8:00 AM, Nikolay Borisov wrote:

>> +#include <asm/realmode.h>
>>   #include <asm/thermal.h>
>>   #include <asm/unwind.h>
>>   #include <asm/vsyscall.h>
>> -#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC)
>> -#include <asm/nmi.h>
>> -#endif
> 
> As far as headers are concerned only this change falls under the 
> "simplify nmi handling code" the others while nice cleanups should 
> ideally be in a separate patch.
> 

You are right. The simplification is only for the #ifdef. I could have
just removed the CONFIG check and left the rest of the headers as-is.

But the <linux/vmalloc.h> include there was completely out of place and
needed to be moved. This eventually led to the reshuffle.

I feel header reordering by itself may not be considered worthwhile as a
patch. Since this series is focussed on cleanups, I tried to keep
cleanups in the same vicinity together. It's mainly to avoid bloating
the patch count but still keep the reviewing of these changes manageable.


>>   
>>   /*
>>    * max_low_pfn_mapped: highest directly mapped pfn < 4 GB
>> @@ -150,6 +147,13 @@ static size_t ima_kexec_buffer_size;
>>   int bootloader_type, bootloader_version;
>>   
>>   static const struct ctl_table x86_sysctl_table[] = {
>> +	{
>> +		.procname       = "unknown_nmi_panic",
>> +		.data           = &unknown_nmi_panic,
>> +		.maxlen         = sizeof(int),
>> +		.mode           = 0644,
>> +		.proc_handler   = proc_dointvec,
>> +	},
>>   	{
>>   		.procname	= "panic_on_unrecovered_nmi",
>>   		.data		= &panic_on_unrecovered_nmi,
>> @@ -185,15 +189,6 @@ static const struct ctl_table x86_sysctl_table[] = {
>>   		.mode		= 0644,
>>   		.proc_handler	= proc_dointvec,
>>   	},
>> -#if defined(CONFIG_X86_LOCAL_APIC)
>> -	{
>> -		.procname       = "unknown_nmi_panic",
>> -		.data           = &unknown_nmi_panic,
>> -		.maxlen         = sizeof(int),
>> -		.mode           = 0644,
>> -		.proc_handler   = proc_dointvec,
>> -	},
>> -#endif
> 
> Why move the definition and not just delete the #ifdef ?
> 

Mainly for consistency. This keeps all the NMI panic options together in
x86_sysctl_table[].

>>   #if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_SLEEP)
>>   	{
>>   		.procname	= "acpi_video_flags",
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2025-04-01 15:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-27 23:46 [PATCH 0/9] x86: Cleanup NMI handling Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 1/9] x86/nmi: Simplify unknown NMI panic handling Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 22:52   ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 23:01     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 15:00   ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-04-01 15:54     ` Sohil Mehta [this message]
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 2/9] x86/nmi: Consolidate NMI panic variables Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 22:43   ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 22:50     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:05       ` Huang, Kai
2025-03-31 23:20         ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  1:06           ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-01  5:46             ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  8:08               ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 3/9] x86/nmi: Use a macro to initialize NMI descriptors Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:46   ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 4/9] x86/nmi: Remove export of local_touch_nmi() Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 23:47   ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 5/9] x86/nmi: Fix comment in unknown NMI handling Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  0:17   ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-01  5:28     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  5:45     ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-04-01  5:53       ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Fix comment in unknown_nmi_error() tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 6/9] x86/nmi: Improve and relocate NMI handler comments Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  1:03   ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/nmi: Improve NMI header documentation Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 10:47   ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-31 16:04     ` Sohil Mehta
2025-03-31 21:36       ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  8:08         ` Ingo Molnar
2025-04-01 16:11           ` Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Add missing description x86_platform_ops::get_nmi_reason to <asm/x86_init.h> tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Improve <asm/nmi.h> documentation tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/nmi: Clean up NMI selftest Sohil Mehta
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] " tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-03-27 23:46 ` [PATCH 9/9] x86/nmi: Improve NMI duration console print Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01  0:42   ` Huang, Kai
2025-04-03 13:33   ` [tip: x86/nmi] x86/nmi: Improve NMI duration console printouts tip-bot2 for Sohil Mehta
2025-04-01 14:54 ` [PATCH 0/9] x86: Cleanup NMI handling Peter Zijlstra
2025-04-01 16:00 ` Nikolay Borisov
2025-04-02 15:13 ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=88198f82-5a45-4a3d-af94-8ac1a4745b86@intel.com \
    --to=sohil.mehta@intel.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
    --cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=rppt@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xin@zytor.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox