From: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
To: Valerie Aurora <valerie.aurora@gmail.com>
Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/74] Union mounts version something or other
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 14:09:34 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8873.1303391374@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi==rGJLQfDXohFZwqCT3m27XWUB4sASzomHWCor@mail.gmail.com>
Valerie Aurora <valerie.aurora@gmail.com> wrote:
> That's never up to date, but I just fixed it. The branch you want is
> "ext2_cleanup". Any branch with "+" at the front is a mistake from
> trying to do a git push of a rebased branch. I deleted it.
Okay, I've got that pulled up to Linus's head branch. I've mostly got the RCU
pathwalk and managed dentry stuff correctly entangled.
However, I have a few questions:
(1) Is it meant to be possible to unionmount over a mount tree rather than
just a single mount? I ask because do_lookup_union() calls
__follow_mount().
(2) When you open a file that exists in the lower layer but not the top
layer, am I right in thinking that f_path points to the lower layer file?
(3) If I'm correct in (2), I presume something must intercept fchown() and
suchlike?
(4) I presume IS_DIR_UNIONED() only gives true on the upper layer (the one
that was mounted -o union)?
David
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-21 13:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1300845590-14184-1-git-send-email-valerie.aurora@gmail.com>
2011-03-23 2:12 ` [PATCH 00/74] Union mounts version something or other Valerie Aurora
2011-03-24 13:43 ` Union mounts comparison with overlay file system prototype? Ric Wheeler
2011-03-25 11:38 ` Szeredi Miklos
2011-03-25 12:12 ` Ric Wheeler
2011-03-23 8:38 ` [PATCH 00/74] Union mounts version something or other Sedat Dilek
2011-03-24 22:40 ` Ben Hutchings
2011-03-25 2:32 ` Sedat Dilek
[not found] ` <1264.1301495438@redhat.com>
2011-04-01 16:48 ` Valerie Aurora
2011-04-21 13:09 ` David Howells [this message]
2011-04-24 21:48 ` Valerie Aurora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8873.1303391374@redhat.com \
--to=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=valerie.aurora@gmail.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox