From: David Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net>
To: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, netdev <netdev@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- connection between HPET and lockups found
Date: Mon, 18 Aug 2008 17:34:41 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <887650.67133.qm@web82104.mail.mud.yahoo.com> (raw)
As part of my experiments to determine the root cause of my lockups,
I was searching through the kernel sources trying to discover any
connection between the changes in the commits introducing the lockups
(3def3d6d... and 1e934dda...) and the fact that "hpet=disable"
alleviates the lockups.
I finally discovered something that looks promising!
Both of those commits introduce changes involving insert_resource(),
and I found the function hpet_insert_resource() in
arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c that also uses insert_resource():
static __init int hpet_insert_resource(void)
{
if (!hpet_res)
return 1;
return insert_resource(&iomem_resource, hpet_res);
}
The effect of "hpet=disable" is to prevent the hpet_res pointer,
static struct __initdata resource *hpet_res;
from being attached to memory, keeping it NULL and causing the
return value to indicate that the HPET resource was not assigned.
When not using "hpet=disable", the memory location of hpet_res
is added to the iomem_resource tree. The code that obtains the
memory for hpet_res is in the same file, in the lines immediately
preceding:
static int __init acpi_parse_hpet(struct acpi_table_header *table)
{
struct acpi_table_hpet *hpet_tbl;
...
#define HPET_RESOURCE_NAME_SIZE 9
hpet_res = alloc_bootmem(sizeof(*hpet_res) + HPET_RESOURCE_NAME_SIZE);
...
return 0;
}
Trying to discover if something was going haywire in this part of the code,
I tried to capture some data which I could save until just before the kernel
locks so that I could printk() it and still see it without having it scroll
off the top:
===== BEGIN DIFF ==========
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
index 9d3528c..c4670a6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c
@@ -644,6 +644,11 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_sbf(struct acpi_table_header *table)
static struct __initdata resource *hpet_res;
+extern void *dw_hpet_res;
+extern int dw_broken_bios;
+extern unsigned dw_seq;
+extern unsigned dw_req_size;
+
static int __init acpi_parse_hpet(struct acpi_table_header *table)
{
struct acpi_table_hpet *hpet_tbl;
@@ -672,6 +677,9 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_hpet(struct acpi_table_header *table)
hpet_tbl->id, hpet_address);
return 0;
}
+
+ dw_broken_bios = 0;
+
#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
/*
* Some even more broken BIOSes advertise HPET at
@@ -679,6 +687,8 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_hpet(struct acpi_table_header *table)
* some noise:
*/
if (hpet_address == 0xfed0000000000000UL) {
+ dw_broken_bios = 1;
+
if (!hpet_force_user) {
printk(KERN_WARNING PREFIX "HPET id: %#x "
"base: 0xfed0000000000000 is bogus\n "
@@ -702,12 +712,15 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_hpet(struct acpi_table_header *table)
*/
#define HPET_RESOURCE_NAME_SIZE 9
hpet_res = alloc_bootmem(sizeof(*hpet_res) + HPET_RESOURCE_NAME_SIZE);
+ dw_hpet_res = hpet_res;
+ dw_req_size = sizeof (*hpet_res) + HPET_RESOURCE_NAME_SIZE;
hpet_res->name = (void *)&hpet_res[1];
hpet_res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
snprintf((char *)hpet_res->name, HPET_RESOURCE_NAME_SIZE, "HPET %u",
hpet_tbl->sequence);
+ dw_seq = hpet_tbl->sequence;
hpet_res->start = hpet_address;
hpet_res->end = hpet_address + (1 * 1024) - 1;
@@ -718,12 +731,19 @@ static int __init acpi_parse_hpet(struct acpi_table_header *table)
* hpet_insert_resource inserts the HPET resources used into the resource
* tree.
*/
+extern int dw_ir_retval;
+
static __init int hpet_insert_resource(void)
{
+ int retval;
+
if (!hpet_res)
return 1;
- return insert_resource(&iomem_resource, hpet_res);
+ retval = insert_resource(&iomem_resource, hpet_res);
+ dw_ir_retval = retval;
+
+ return retval;
}
late_initcall(hpet_insert_resource);
diff --git a/net/core/dev.c b/net/core/dev.c
index 600bb23..fe27b94 100644
--- a/net/core/dev.c
+++ b/net/core/dev.c
@@ -4304,10 +4304,21 @@ void free_netdev(struct net_device *dev)
put_device(&dev->dev);
}
+void *dw_hpet_res;
+int dw_broken_bios;
+unsigned dw_seq;
+int dw_ir_retval;
+unsigned dw_req_size;
+
/* Synchronize with packet receive processing. */
void synchronize_net(void)
{
might_sleep();
+
+ printk ("Data from arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c:\n");
+ printk (" hpet_res = %p requested size: %u\n", dw_hpet_res, dw_req_size);
+ printk (" sequence = %u insert_resource() returned: %d\n", dw_seq, dw_ir_retval);
+ printk (" broken_bios: %d\n", dw_broken_bios);
synchronize_rcu();
}
===== END DIFF ==========
The output I get when the kernel locks up looks perfectly OK, except
maybe for the address of hpet_res (which I am not knowledgeable enough
to judge):
Data from arch/x86/kernel/acpi/boot.c:
hpet_res = ffff88000100f000 broken_bios: 0
sequence = 0 insert_resource() returned: 0
I see some recent (Aug. 2008) discussion of alloc_bootmem() being
broken, so maybe that is related to my problem.
Does this connection between HPET and insert_resource() look meaningful,
or is this a coincidence?
Thanks,
Dave W.
next reply other threads:[~2008-08-19 0:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-08-19 0:34 David Witbrodt [this message]
2008-08-19 1:14 ` HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- connection between HPET and lockups found Ingo Molnar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-08-19 3:51 David Witbrodt
2008-08-19 9:23 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-08-19 12:49 David Witbrodt
2008-08-19 13:08 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=887650.67133.qm@web82104.mail.mud.yahoo.com \
--to=dawitbro@sbcglobal.net \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=yhlu.kernel@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox