From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-177.mta1.migadu.com (out-177.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2962205149 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.177 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730201436; cv=none; b=s29r48rkSEVUUWz4B0P2GgcAEKe7hLl9Z2NQWha2q1MN/I4zWcstFgV3DfMal/i9OYccnDMowDXFWhoWvY1jNNkozEFQ26HU0CqD+kSB9UEn+0wrhWHUtNnWwRALSOEQ5Gny95Gb/ai0g3QbI2lVcmJ7eJxYCI4cEcks/w2weag= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730201436; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZJWIOaODwIfc/DttkrsPEXQKTwuWHVM2VjAiuA13IIo=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ewr5n5xDxZlZh6VCV+yVBzf+ahpgrJc3mKhb6CoJQ8HeazPktJjyiHN5a8bIO94d4T206utuNhU0eCyngE60DxJBKxfUOrnjhb+C9vUbhLzWZZHGMyshasK4Ow6gK+VQ3BO/Z83NdPwOjSabbc7/LSsPKSoM8ky/07aJHqTNcKE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=opo5ntqs; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.177 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="opo5ntqs" Message-ID: <8899c12f-bc2f-49d3-bded-e838ac18fef8@linux.dev> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1730201427; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=fnPiSIzYx1HHGDGVnrngZ9mBvsB94BIHWT4QM52rRrM=; b=opo5ntqsA8rr6ubL3xvniGK9UObixzdsM+/2sqePNDeiRZPc/roalwOphgW0PwWipbSQfi Oh72XIPwiRbf31ILLkk16qo64TyZicotgGiN7R/D/xeaCxCLyTHZ1FpGMFgt8utXVkO6X4 P1AgBMDxwvbDC7It1PGCtzQQYSzFAng= Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 11:30:22 +0000 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 0/2] ptp: add control over HW timestamp latch point To: Arkadiusz Kubalewski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-wired-lan@lists.osuosl.org Cc: anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com, przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com, davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com, richardcochran@gmail.com References: <20241028204755.1514189-1-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Vadim Fedorenko In-Reply-To: <20241028204755.1514189-1-arkadiusz.kubalewski@intel.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 28/10/2024 20:47, Arkadiusz Kubalewski wrote: > HW support of PTP/timesync solutions in network PHY chips can be > achieved with two different approaches, the timestamp maybe latched > either in the beginning or after the Start of Frame Delimiter (SFD) [1]. > > Allow ptp device drivers to provide user with control over the timestamp > latch point. > > [1] https://www.ieee802.org/3/cx/public/april20/tse_3cx_01_0420.pdf I just wonder should we add ethtool interface to control this feature. As we are adding it for phy devices, it's good idea to have a way to control it through eth device too. WDYT?