From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@mbligh.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
Cc: dev@sw.ru, torvalds@osdl.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] NMI watchdog config option (was: Re: [PATCH] NMI lockup and AltSysRq-P dumping calltraces on _all_ cpus via NMI IPI)
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 15:26:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <896520000.1116368774@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20050517151648.2abff61e.akpm@osdl.org>
>> > So much has changed in there that we might have fixed it by accident, and I
>> > do recall a couple of fundamental and subtle NMI bugs being fixed. So
>> > yeah, it might be worth enabling it by default again. Care to send a patch
>> > which does that?
>>
>> There are some unfixable machine issues - for instance, the IBM
>> Netfinity 8500R corrupts one of the registers (ebx?) every time we get
>> an NMI for us, and panics. Probably other boxes you mention above have
>> similar issues? But it's not our code that's at fault ...
>
> That sounds like an instant crash. The problems which were reported a few
> years back were different - mysterious lockups after hours or days of
> operation.
Dunno, might have been a race, or only happened if the wind was blowing
North at the time. More likely different machines had different forms of
failures caused by various obscure bugs ;-) If you're really curious, I
could go test it I spose.
>> In light of this, I don't think it's a good idea to enable NMI by default,
>> at least not without a blacklist function of some sort?
>
> OK, thanks - I'll leave things as they stand.
Thanks. I think it's safer that way ...
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-05-17 22:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-05-11 15:57 [PATCH] NMI lockup and AltSysRq-P dumping calltraces on _all_ cpus via NMI IPI Kirill Korotaev
2005-05-16 22:34 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-05-17 7:04 ` [PATCH] NMI watchdog config option (was: Re: [PATCH] NMI lockup and AltSysRq-P dumping calltraces on _all_ cpus via NMI IPI) Kirill Korotaev
2005-05-17 7:15 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-17 10:41 ` Kirill Korotaev
2005-05-17 14:01 ` Martin J. Bligh
2005-05-17 22:16 ` Andrew Morton
2005-05-17 22:26 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2005-05-17 17:30 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2005-05-17 15:48 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-17 15:59 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-05-17 16:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-17 17:04 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-05-17 17:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2005-05-17 17:44 ` Maciej W. Rozycki
2005-05-17 17:25 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=896520000.1116368774@flay \
--to=mbligh@mbligh.org \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=dev@sw.ru \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox