From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 03:38:04 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 03:37:56 -0400 Received: from mailout02.sul.t-online.com ([194.25.134.17]:48912 "EHLO mailout02.sul.t-online.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 21 Sep 2001 03:37:38 -0400 Date: 21 Sep 2001 09:01:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <89H08dn1w-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: <7910.1001049576@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> Subject: Re: RFC 3168 on The Addition of ECN to IP (fwd) X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh7 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? In-Reply-To: <7910.1001049576@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org kaos@ocs.com.au (Keith Owens) wrote on 21.09.01 in <7910.1001049576@kao2.melbourne.sgi.com>: > For those people who complained that ECN was only a draft, it is now a > proposed standard. I wonder what excuse will be used now for not ******** > upgrading the broken routers :). Guess. MfG Kai