From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
To: tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com
Cc: x86@kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dlazar@gmail.com, hdegoede@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] x86/apic: Allow reprogramming IOAPIC pins the first time for non-legacy IRQs
Date: Mon, 23 Oct 2023 08:26:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <89a51be4-38f9-4a9e-85fb-52c48a8fd433@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231020033806.88063-1-mario.limonciello@amd.com>
On 10/19/2023 22:38, Mario Limonciello wrote:
> If the system is set up without legacy IRQs configured
> acpi_register_gsi_ioapic() still needs to be able to program the IOAPIC
> to match the values from _CRS which might not match what is already
> programmed to the IOAPIC.
>
> Reported-by: dlazar@gmail.com
> Closes: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=218003
> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 8 ++------
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> index 00da6cf6b07d..27dd279dcc7b 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c
> @@ -928,12 +928,8 @@ static bool mp_check_pin_attr(int irq, struct irq_alloc_info *info)
> {
> struct mp_chip_data *data = irq_get_chip_data(irq);
>
> - /*
> - * setup_IO_APIC_irqs() programs all legacy IRQs with default trigger
> - * and polarity attributes. So allow the first user to reprogram the
> - * pin with real trigger and polarity attributes.
> - */
> - if (irq < nr_legacy_irqs() && data->count == 1) {
> + /* allow the first user to reprogram the pin with real trigger and polarity */
> + if (data->count == 1) {
> if (info->ioapic.is_level != data->is_level)
> mp_register_handler(irq, info->ioapic.is_level);
> data->entry.is_level = data->is_level = info->ioapic.is_level;
David mentioned it on the Bugzilla, but for the benefit of those not
looking there, this series is confirmed to fix the problem.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-10-23 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-10-20 3:38 [PATCH 1/2] x86/apic: Allow reprogramming IOAPIC pins the first time for non-legacy IRQs Mario Limonciello
2023-10-20 3:38 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/irq/i8259: Configure null pic to have one legacy IRQ Mario Limonciello
2023-10-23 13:26 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=89a51be4-38f9-4a9e-85fb-52c48a8fd433@amd.com \
--to=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dlazar@gmail.com \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox