Re: [PATCH iwl-net v1 2/4] igc: Fix reset adapter logics when tx mode change

["Abdul Rahim, Faizal" <faizal.abdul.rahim@linux.intel.com>]

>> ---
>>   drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++++---
>>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
>> index 02dd41aff634..61f047ebf34d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igc/igc_tsn.c
>> @@ -49,6 +49,13 @@ static unsigned int igc_tsn_new_flags(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
>>   	return new_flags;
>>   }
>>   
>> +static bool igc_tsn_is_tx_mode_in_tsn(struct igc_adapter *adapter)
>> +{
>> +	struct igc_hw *hw = &adapter->hw;
>> +
>> +	return (bool)(rd32(IGC_TQAVCTRL) & IGC_TQAVCTRL_TRANSMIT_MODE_TSN);
> 
> Perhaps it is more a question of taste than anything else.
> But my preference, FIIW, is to avoid casts.
> And I think in this case using !! is a common pattern.
> 
> (Completely untested!)
> 
> 	return !!(rd32(IGC_TQAVCTRL) & IGC_TQAVCTRL_TRANSMIT_MODE_TSN);
> 

Sure, will update.

>> +
>> +	if ((any_tsn_enabled && !igc_tsn_is_tx_mode_in_tsn(adapter)) ||
>> +	    (!any_tsn_enabled && igc_tsn_is_tx_mode_in_tsn(adapter)))
>> +		return true;
>> +	else
>> +		return false;
> 
> Likewise, this is probably more a matter of taste than anything else.
> But I think this could be expressed as:
> 
> (Completely untested!)
> 
> 	return (any_tsn_enabled && !igc_tsn_is_tx_mode_in_tsn(adapter)) ||
> 		(!any_tsn_enabled && igc_tsn_is_tx_mode_in_tsn(adapter));
> 
> Similarly in the previous patch of this series.
> 

Will update, your suggestion is better, lesser parenthesis.
Thanks.