From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Rusty's module talk at the Kernel Summit
Date: 12 Jul 2002 08:49:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8Skj1EFHw-B@khms.westfalen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20020712035658.83B41412D@lists.samba.org>
rusty@rustcorp.com.au (Rusty Russell) wrote on 12.07.02 in <20020712035658.83B41412D@lists.samba.org>:
> As implemented, it results in spurious failure. Failing to do
> something because the module was being removed at the time, and
> falling back to module load fails because the old module hasn't
> released some resource yet.
Hmm.
Anyone thought about the idea of parking a module in unregistered-but-not-
removed state, such that it can be "reloaded" by just getting it to
reregister, and only actually removing it later (from a userspace
trigger)?
Or would that only move the problem moment?
MfG Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-12 6:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 48+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-04 17:24 Rusty's module talk at the Kernel Summit Adam J. Richter
2002-07-11 2:48 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-11 2:45 ` David S. Miller
2002-07-11 3:30 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-11 5:13 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-11 6:37 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-11 7:14 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-11 10:54 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 17:37 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-11 18:01 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-11 18:50 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-17 18:16 ` bill davidsen
2002-07-17 19:35 ` Thunder from the hill
2002-07-11 18:28 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 19:48 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-11 20:29 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-11 23:37 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-12 1:54 ` Daniel Phillips
2002-07-12 3:53 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-12 6:49 ` Kai Henningsen [this message]
2002-07-12 11:30 ` Roman Zippel
2002-07-12 0:00 ` Rusty Russell
2002-07-12 6:57 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-07-19 0:19 ` Richard Gooch
2002-07-22 16:29 ` Alexander Viro
2002-07-23 4:37 ` Richard Gooch
2002-07-11 4:02 ` Cort Dougan
2002-07-11 4:19 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-11 4:46 ` Cort Dougan
2002-07-11 2:55 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-11 3:01 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2002-07-11 5:16 ` Rusty Russell
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-07-11 5:44 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-11 5:07 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-03 15:53 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-03 17:07 ` Hugh Dickins
2002-07-03 18:46 ` Oliver Neukum
2002-07-03 23:25 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-03 23:09 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-03 7:31 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-03 8:54 ` Rogier Wolff
2002-07-03 12:27 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-03 14:10 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-01 17:20 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-01 16:12 Adam J. Richter
2002-07-01 17:02 ` jlnance
2002-07-03 5:01 ` Keith Owens
2002-07-01 8:45 Keith Owens
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8Skj1EFHw-B@khms.westfalen.de \
--to=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox