From: Vincenzo Mezzela <vincenzo.mezzela@gmail.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com,
julia.lawall@inria.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
rafael@kernel.org, skhan@linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2 v4] drivers: arch_topology: introduce automatic cleanup feature
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 09:14:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a0df605-463f-4d61-ad64-a39f3ebb3153@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZkHlHAj1aPEToEYO@bogus>
On 13/05/24 12:02, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 10:13:02AM +0200, Vincenzo Mezzela wrote:
>> This patch series introduces the automatic cleanup feature using the __free
>> attribute. With this modification, resources allocated with __free are
>> automatically released at the end of the scope.
>>
>> In some cases, modifying the structure of loops is necessary to utilize the
>> __free attribute effectively. For example:
>>
>> ```
>> struct device_node *t;
>>
>> do {
>> t = of_get_child_by_name(..);
>> if (t) {
>>
>> // some code here
>>
>> of_node_put(t);
>> }
>> i++;
>>
>> } while (t);
>>
>> // ^
>> // |
>> // device_node here
>> ```
>>
>> To use the __free attribute here, we need to move the declaration of the device_node
>> within the loop, otherwise the automatic cleanup is called only at the end of the
>> function, and not at end of each iteration of the loop, being it scope-based.
>>
>> However, moving the declaration of the device_node within the loop, we can no
>> longer check the exit condition in the loop statement, being it outside
>> the loop's scope.
>>
>> Therefore, this work is split into two patches. The first patch moves the exit
>> condition of the loop directly within the loop's scope with an explicit break
>> statement:
>>
>> ```
>> struct device_node *t;
>>
>> do {
>> t = of_get_child_by_name(..);
>> if (!t)
>> break;
>>
>> // some code here
>>
>> of_node_put(t);
>> i++;
>>
>> } while (1);
>> ```
>> The second patch eliminates all of_node_put() calls, introducing the __free
>> attribute to the device_node.
>>
>>
>> changes in v2:
>> - check loop exit condition within the loop
>> - add cleanup.h header
>>
>> changes in v3:
>> - split patch in two
>> - fix misalignment
>> - fix checkpatch warnings
>> - replace break with return statement where possible
>>
>> changes in v4:
>> - fix commit subject
>> - fix coding style
>>
> Looks good now to me.
>
> Acked-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
>
> It is merge window now, so there is a chance that it may get lost. You
> may have to post it again at -rc1. Greg can then pick it up for v6.11
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
Ok, perfect.
Thanks!
Vincenzo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-14 7:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-19 13:19 [PATCH] drivers: use __free attribute instead of of_node_put() Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-04-19 14:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-04-22 8:27 ` Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-04-22 13:09 ` [PATCH v2] " Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-04-24 10:37 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-04-24 12:42 ` Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-04-24 12:54 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-05-01 9:43 ` [PATCH 0/2 v3] drivers: introduce automatic cleanup feature Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-05-01 9:43 ` [PATCH 1/2 v3] drivers: reorganize do-while loops Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-05-01 11:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-05-01 9:43 ` [PATCH 2/2 v3] drivers: use __free attribute instead of of_node_put() Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-05-01 10:48 ` Greg KH
2024-05-01 12:33 ` Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-05-01 13:06 ` Greg KH
2024-05-06 15:30 ` Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-05-07 10:32 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-05-01 11:08 ` Sudeep Holla
2024-05-01 11:56 ` Julia Lawall
2024-05-01 13:19 ` [PATCH 0/2 v3] drivers: introduce automatic cleanup feature Conor Dooley
2024-05-13 8:13 ` [PATCH 0/2 v4] drivers: arch_topology: " Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-05-13 8:13 ` [PATCH 1/2 v4] drivers: arch_topology: Refactor do-while loops Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-05-13 8:13 ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] drivers: arch_topology: use __free attribute instead of of_node_put() Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-05-13 10:02 ` [PATCH 0/2 v4] drivers: arch_topology: introduce automatic cleanup feature Sudeep Holla
2024-05-14 7:14 ` Vincenzo Mezzela [this message]
2024-05-28 8:23 ` Vincenzo Mezzela
2024-06-03 8:45 ` Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a0df605-463f-4d61-ad64-a39f3ebb3153@gmail.com \
--to=vincenzo.mezzela@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=javier.carrasco.cruz@gmail.com \
--cc=julia.lawall@inria.fr \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox