From: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>
To: "Jürgen Groß" <jgross@suse.com>, "Kees Cook" <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/xen: Distribute switch variables for initialization
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 11:33:41 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8a7f5bd7-2bb6-d187-cc6e-87ff01c440ce@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16a166da-c6e7-aa36-53a0-1b56197c8fc0@suse.com>
On 2/20/20 1:37 AM, Jürgen Groß wrote:
> On 20.02.20 07:23, Kees Cook wrote:
>> Variables declared in a switch statement before any case statements
>> cannot be automatically initialized with compiler instrumentation (as
>> they are not part of any execution flow). With GCC's proposed automatic
>> stack variable initialization feature, this triggers a warning (and they
>> don't get initialized). Clang's automatic stack variable initialization
>> (via CONFIG_INIT_STACK_ALL=y) doesn't throw a warning, but it also
>> doesn't initialize such variables[1]. Note that these warnings (or
>> silent
>> skipping) happen before the dead-store elimination optimization phase,
>> so even when the automatic initializations are later elided in favor of
>> direct initializations, the warnings remain.
>>
>> To avoid these problems, move such variables into the "case" where
>> they're used or lift them up into the main function body.
>>
>> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c: In function ‘xen_write_msr_safe’:
>> arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pv.c:904:12: warning: statement will never be
>> executed [-Wswitch-unreachable]
>> 904 | unsigned which;
>> | ^~~~~
>>
>> [1] https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44916
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
>
> Reviewed-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
>
Applied to for-linus-5.6.
(I replaced 'unsigned' with 'unsigned int' to quiet down checkpatch )
-boris
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-20 16:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-20 6:23 [PATCH] x86/xen: Distribute switch variables for initialization Kees Cook
2020-02-20 6:37 ` Jürgen Groß
2020-02-20 16:33 ` Boris Ostrovsky [this message]
2020-02-20 23:05 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8a7f5bd7-2bb6-d187-cc6e-87ff01c440ce@oracle.com \
--to=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox