From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>, vkoul@kernel.org
Cc: yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, sanyog.r.kale@intel.com,
alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
patches@opensource.cirrus.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] soundwire: stream: Invert logic on runtime alloc flags
Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2023 10:01:20 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ad62f37-8cf7-6bd0-3d4d-d04d5def893c@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230602101140.2040141-4-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
On 6/2/23 05:11, Charles Keepax wrote:
> sdw_stream_add_slave/master have flags to indicate if the master or
> slave runtime where allocated in that call to the function. Currently
> these flags are cleared on all the paths where the runtime is not
> allocated, it is more logic and simpler to set the flag on the one path
> where the runtime is allocated.
>
> Signed-off-by: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Much easier to review indeed, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
> ---
>
> Changes since v1:
> - Split out of the goto patch to ease review
>
> Also worth noting I guess this patch could be squashed with patch 1 in
> the series really, but I opted to leave them separate as patch 1 is a
> much simpler fix to be cherry-picked back to older kernels if someone
> needs the fixup, rather than mixing the fixup and tidy up.
>
> Thanks,
> Charles
>
> drivers/soundwire/stream.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> index 6595f47b403b5..df5600a80c174 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/stream.c
> @@ -1854,7 +1854,7 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> struct sdw_stream_runtime *stream)
> {
> struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
> - bool alloc_master_rt = true;
> + bool alloc_master_rt = false;
> int ret;
>
> mutex_lock(&bus->bus_lock);
> @@ -1876,10 +1876,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> * it first), if so skip allocation and go to configuration
> */
> m_rt = sdw_master_rt_find(bus, stream);
> - if (m_rt) {
> - alloc_master_rt = false;
> + if (m_rt)
> goto skip_alloc_master_rt;
> - }
>
> m_rt = sdw_master_rt_alloc(bus, stream);
> if (!m_rt) {
> @@ -1888,6 +1886,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_master(struct sdw_bus *bus,
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto unlock;
> }
> +
> + alloc_master_rt = true;
> skip_alloc_master_rt:
>
> if (sdw_master_port_allocated(m_rt))
> @@ -1980,8 +1980,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> {
> struct sdw_slave_runtime *s_rt;
> struct sdw_master_runtime *m_rt;
> - bool alloc_master_rt = true;
> - bool alloc_slave_rt = true;
> + bool alloc_master_rt = false;
> + bool alloc_slave_rt = false;
>
> int ret;
>
> @@ -1992,10 +1992,8 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> * and go to configuration
> */
> m_rt = sdw_master_rt_find(slave->bus, stream);
> - if (m_rt) {
> - alloc_master_rt = false;
> + if (m_rt)
> goto skip_alloc_master_rt;
> - }
>
> /*
> * If this API is invoked by Slave first then m_rt is not valid.
> @@ -2009,21 +2007,22 @@ int sdw_stream_add_slave(struct sdw_slave *slave,
> goto unlock;
> }
>
> + alloc_master_rt = true;
> +
> skip_alloc_master_rt:
> s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_find(slave, stream);
> - if (s_rt) {
> - alloc_slave_rt = false;
> + if (s_rt)
> goto skip_alloc_slave_rt;
> - }
>
> s_rt = sdw_slave_rt_alloc(slave, m_rt);
> if (!s_rt) {
> dev_err(&slave->dev, "Slave runtime alloc failed for stream:%s\n", stream->name);
> - alloc_slave_rt = false;
> ret = -ENOMEM;
> goto alloc_error;
> }
>
> + alloc_slave_rt = true;
> +
> skip_alloc_slave_rt:
> if (sdw_slave_port_allocated(s_rt))
> goto skip_port_alloc;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-02 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-02 10:11 [PATCH v2 1/5] soundwire: stream: Add missing clear of alloc_slave_rt Charles Keepax
2023-06-02 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] soundwire: bandwidth allocation: Remove pointless variable Charles Keepax
2023-06-02 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] soundwire: stream: Remove unneeded checks for NULL bus Charles Keepax
2023-06-02 14:57 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-06-02 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] soundwire: stream: Invert logic on runtime alloc flags Charles Keepax
2023-06-02 15:01 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
2023-06-02 10:11 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] soundwire: stream: Remove unnecessary gotos Charles Keepax
2023-06-02 15:13 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2023-06-08 11:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] soundwire: stream: Add missing clear of alloc_slave_rt Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8ad62f37-8cf7-6bd0-3d4d-d04d5def893c@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=sanyog.r.kale@intel.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox