From: "Jin, Yao" <yao.jin@linux.intel.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Cc: jolsa@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ak@linux.intel.com, kan.liang@intel.com, yao.jin@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf stat: Skip duration_time in setup_system_wide
Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2020 10:05:56 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8b4e9938-2d15-8320-85e9-e14ddd51c743@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200922180218.GC2248446@kernel.org>
Hi Arnaldo,
On 9/23/2020 2:02 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 02:56:30PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
>> Em Tue, Sep 22, 2020 at 09:50:04AM +0800, Jin Yao escreveu:
>>> Some metrics (such as DRAM_BW_Use) consists of uncore events and
>>> duration_time. For uncore events, counter->core.system_wide is
>>> true. But for duration_time, counter->core.system_wide is false
>>> so target.system_wide is set to false.
>>>
>>> Then 'enable_on_exec' is set in perf_event_attr of uncore event.
>>> Kernel will return error when trying to open the uncore event.
>>>
>>> This patch skips the duration_time in setup_system_wide then
>>> target.system_wide will be set to true for the evlist of uncore
>>> events + duration_time.
>>>
>>> Before (tested on skylake desktop):
>>>
>>> # perf stat -M DRAM_BW_Use -- sleep 1
>>> Error:
>>> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/).
>>> /bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.
>>>
>>> After:
>>>
>>> # perf stat -M DRAM_BW_Use -- sleep 1
>>>
>>> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>>>
>>> 169 arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/ # 0.00 DRAM_BW_Use
>>> 40,427 arb/event=0x81,umask=0x1/
>>> 1,000,902,197 ns duration_time
>>>
>>> 1.000902197 seconds time elapsed
>>>
>>> Fixes: 648b5af3f3ae ("libperf: Move 'system_wide' from 'struct evsel' to 'struct perf_evsel'")
>>
>> Humm, what makes you think that this cset was the one introducing this
>> problem? It just moves evsel->system_wide to evsel->core.system_wide.
>
> Apart from that I reproduced the problem and after applying your patch
> it seems cured:
>
> [acme@quaco perf]$ grep 'model name' -m1 /proc/cpuinfo
> model name : Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-8650U CPU @ 1.90GHz
>
> Before (with -v to see details):
>
> [root@quaco ~]# perf stat -v -M DRAM_BW_Use -- sleep 1
> Using CPUID GenuineIntel-6-8E-A
> metric expr 64 * ( arb@event\=0x81\,umask\=0x1@ + arb@event\=0x84\,umask\=0x1@ ) / 1000000 / duration_time / 1000 for DRAM_BW_Use
> found event duration_time
> found event arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/
> found event arb/event=0x81,umask=0x1/
> adding {arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/,arb/event=0x81,umask=0x1/}:W,duration_time
> Control descriptor is not initialized
> Warning:
> arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/ event is not supported by the kernel.
> Error:
> The sys_perf_event_open() syscall returned with 22 (Invalid argument) for event (arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/).
> /bin/dmesg | grep -i perf may provide additional information.
>
> [root@quaco ~]#
>
> After:
>
> [root@quaco ~]# perf stat -M DRAM_BW_Use -- sleep 1
>
> Performance counter stats for 'system wide':
>
> 2,806 arb/event=0x84,umask=0x1/ # 0.63 DRAM_BW_Use
> 10,001,820 arb/event=0x81,umask=0x1/
> 1,016,875,686 ns duration_time
>
> 1.016875686 seconds time elapsed
>
> [root@quaco ~]#
>
> So I'm removing that fixes and adding this one, that I think is where
> "duration_time" was being considered...
>
> Fixes: e3ba76deef23064f ("perf tools: Force uncore events to system wide monitoring")
>
Yes, this fixes is much better, thanks.
> Also, wouldn't it be better to have the duration_time event with its
> evsel->core.system_wide set to true?
>
That looks to be another solution, should be OK too I think. :)
But anyway we need a test.
Thanks
Jin Yao
> - Arnaldo
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-09-23 2:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-09-22 1:50 [PATCH] perf stat: Skip duration_time in setup_system_wide Jin Yao
2020-09-22 17:56 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-22 18:02 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-09-23 2:05 ` Jin, Yao [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8b4e9938-2d15-8320-85e9-e14ddd51c743@linux.intel.com \
--to=yao.jin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=Linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=yao.jin@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox