From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen)
To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ???
Date: 07 Dec 2002 22:39:00 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bPzdb6mw-B@khms.westfalen.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1039111796.19636.27.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>
alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) wrote on 05.12.02 in <1039111796.19636.27.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>:
> On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 12:54, Joseph D. Wagner wrote:
> > I don't know of any mistakes per say, but if I had to do it over again,
> > there's about a thousands things I'd do differently (preference in design
> > choices, not mistakes) especially not to cling so religiously to POSIX
> > compliance.
>
> And then you'd have no applications.
And this is why every existing OS is POSIX compliant.
What do you mean, it isn't?
People actually started new, incompatible OSes from time to time, for
which there were no applications, and some of those actually succeeded?
And in fact Unix was one of those?
MfG Kai
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-12-07 22:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-12-05 2:00 is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? Ed Vance
2002-12-05 12:24 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-05 12:54 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-05 13:15 ` Andreas Schwab
2002-12-05 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 19:52 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-05 20:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2002-12-05 20:09 ` is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? (ACLs) Tupshin Harper
2002-12-06 10:38 ` Jakob Oestergaard
2002-12-15 5:29 ` Tracy R Reed
2002-12-07 20:34 ` is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? Kai Henningsen
2002-12-05 18:09 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-05 17:47 ` yodaiken
2002-12-05 19:08 ` John Bradford
2002-12-06 6:15 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-06 6:30 ` John Alvord
2002-12-06 9:48 ` Alvaro Lopes
2002-12-07 20:43 ` Kai Henningsen
2002-12-07 20:39 ` Kai Henningsen [this message]
2002-12-09 14:08 ` Jesse Pollard
2002-12-10 0:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2002-12-05 14:33 ` Mikael Pettersson
[not found] <sdef301b.011@mail-01.med.umich.edu>
2002-12-05 16:36 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-06 3:29 ` Keith Adamson
[not found] <sdef2367.029@mail-02.med.umich.edu>
2002-12-05 15:17 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-05 15:38 ` Dave Jones
2002-12-05 15:44 ` Eric Weigle
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-12-05 14:58 Nicholas Berry
2002-12-03 13:03 cs driver SANTHOSH K
2002-12-04 15:26 ` is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? Shane Helms
2002-12-04 17:01 ` Joseph D. Wagner
2002-12-04 18:38 ` Alan Cox
2002-12-04 18:07 ` Richard B. Tilley (Brad)
2002-12-04 18:21 ` Richard B. Johnson
2002-12-04 18:39 ` Erik Andersen
2002-12-05 16:59 ` Bill Davidsen
2002-12-05 0:27 ` jeff millar
2002-12-05 23:55 ` Frank van Maarseveen
2002-12-06 0:24 ` Shane Helms
2002-12-06 3:00 ` jeff millar
2002-12-06 3:36 ` Miles Bader
2002-12-06 8:55 ` Helge Hafting
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bPzdb6mw-B@khms.westfalen.de \
--to=kaih@khms.westfalen.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox