From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 17:28:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 17:27:24 -0500 Received: from khms.westfalen.de ([62.153.201.243]:3993 "EHLO khms.westfalen.de") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sat, 7 Dec 2002 17:27:17 -0500 Date: 07 Dec 2002 22:39:00 +0200 From: kaih@khms.westfalen.de (Kai Henningsen) To: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <8bPzdb6mw-B@khms.westfalen.de> In-Reply-To: <1039111796.19636.27.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> Subject: Re: is KERNEL developement finished, yet ??? X-Mailer: CrossPoint v3.12d.kh10 R/C435 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Organisation? Me?! Are you kidding? References: <1039111796.19636.27.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk> X-No-Junk-Mail: I do not want to get *any* junk mail. Comment: Unsolicited commercial mail will incur an US$100 handling fee per received mail. X-Fix-Your-Modem: +++ATS2=255&WO1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox) wrote on 05.12.02 in <1039111796.19636.27.camel@irongate.swansea.linux.org.uk>: > On Thu, 2002-12-05 at 12:54, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: > > I don't know of any mistakes per say, but if I had to do it over again, > > there's about a thousands things I'd do differently (preference in design > > choices, not mistakes) especially not to cling so religiously to POSIX > > compliance. > > And then you'd have no applications. And this is why every existing OS is POSIX compliant. What do you mean, it isn't? People actually started new, incompatible OSes from time to time, for which there were no applications, and some of those actually succeeded? And in fact Unix was one of those? MfG Kai