From: steven chen <chenste@linux.microsoft.com>
To: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: stefanb@linux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com,
roberto.sassu@huawei.com, eric.snowberg@oracle.com,
ebiederm@xmission.com, paul@paul-moore.com, code@tyhicks.com,
bauermann@kolabnow.com, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org,
kexec@lists.infradead.org, linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, madvenka@linux.microsoft.com,
nramas@linux.microsoft.com,
James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com, vgoyal@redhat.com,
dyoung@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 1/7] ima: copy only complete measurement records across kexec
Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2025 14:45:50 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bc74dd8-ecd0-44ad-88a2-8b36fa61100a@linux.microsoft.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fe6e3c1333a50d66dc876b5a196d3491170802a8.camel@linux.ibm.com>
On 3/5/2025 4:27 AM, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Wed, 2025-03-05 at 20:08 +0800, Baoquan He wrote:
>> On 03/04/25 at 11:03am, steven chen wrote:
>>> Carrying the IMA measurement list across kexec requires allocating a
>>> buffer and copying the measurement records. Separate allocating the
>>> buffer and copying the measurement records into separate functions in
>>> order to allocate the buffer at kexec 'load' and copy the measurements
>>> at kexec 'execute'.
>>>
>>> This patch includes the following changes:
>> I don't know why one patch need include so many changes. From below log,
>> it should be split into separate patches. It may not need to make one
>> patch to reflect one change, we should at least split and wrap several
>> kind of changes to ease patch understanding and reviewing. My personal
>> opinion.
> Agreed, well explained.
>
> Mimi
>
>>> - Refactor ima_dump_measurement_list() to move the memory allocation
>>> to a separate function ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf() which allocates
>>> buffer of size 'kexec_segment_size' at kexec 'load'.
>>> - Make the local variable ima_kexec_file in ima_dump_measurement_list()
>>> a local static to the file, so that it can be accessed from
>>> ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf(). Compare actual memory required to ensure
>>> there is enough memory for the entire measurement record.
>>> - Copy only complete measurement records.
>>> - Make necessary changes to the function ima_add_kexec_buffer() to call
>>> the above two functions.
>>> - Compared the memory size allocated with memory size of the entire
>>> measurement record. Copy only complete measurement records if there
>>> is enough memory. If there is not enough memory, it will not copy
>>> any IMA measurement records, and this situation will result in a
>>> failure of remote attestation.
>>>
>>> Suggested-by: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tushar Sugandhi <tusharsu@linux.microsoft.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: steven chen <chenste@linux.microsoft.com>
I will split this patch into the following two patches:
ima: define and call ima_alloc_kexec_file_buf
ima: copy measurement records as much as possible across kexec
Thanks,
Steven
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-06 22:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-04 19:03 [PATCH v9 0/7] ima: kexec: measure events between kexec load and execute steven chen
2025-03-04 19:03 ` [PATCH v9 1/7] ima: copy only complete measurement records across kexec steven chen
2025-03-05 2:08 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-05 11:34 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-05 12:08 ` Baoquan He
2025-03-05 12:27 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-06 22:45 ` steven chen [this message]
2025-03-07 2:51 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-11 12:44 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-11 23:45 ` steven chen
2025-03-04 19:03 ` [PATCH v9 2/7] kexec: define functions to map and unmap segments steven chen
2025-03-04 22:23 ` Jarkko Sakkinen
2025-03-05 0:55 ` steven chen
2025-03-05 12:24 ` Baoquan He
2025-03-17 18:26 ` steven chen
2025-03-06 6:35 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-04 19:03 ` [PATCH v9 3/7] ima: kexec: skip IMA segment validation after kexec soft reboot steven chen
2025-03-05 12:37 ` Baoquan He
2025-03-04 19:03 ` [PATCH v9 4/7] ima: kexec: define functions to copy IMA log at soft boot steven chen
2025-03-12 8:57 ` kernel test robot
2025-03-04 19:03 ` [PATCH v9 5/7] ima: kexec: move IMA log copy from kexec load to execute steven chen
2025-03-04 19:03 ` [PATCH v9 6/7] ima: make the kexec extra memory configurable steven chen
2025-03-04 19:03 ` [PATCH v9 7/7] ima: measure kexec load and exec events as critical data steven chen
2025-03-05 0:25 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-03-05 0:57 ` steven chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bc74dd8-ecd0-44ad-88a2-8b36fa61100a@linux.microsoft.com \
--to=chenste@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=bauermann@kolabnow.com \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=code@tyhicks.com \
--cc=dyoung@redhat.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
--cc=kexec@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madvenka@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=nramas@linux.microsoft.com \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
--cc=roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=vgoyal@redhat.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox