From: Chao Yu <chao@kernel.org>
To: Jianan Huang <huangjianan@xiaomi.com>,
linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, jaegeuk@kernel.org
Cc: chao@kernel.org, daehojeong@google.com, jnhuang95@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wanghui33@xiaomi.com,
yudongbin@xiaomi.com
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: fix inconsistent dirty state of atomic file
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2025 17:49:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8bee628f-69a4-419e-aaee-c72b7c7861f9@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250123071417.253019-1-huangjianan@xiaomi.com>
On 1/23/25 15:14, Jianan Huang via Linux-f2fs-devel wrote:
> When testing the atomic write fix patches, the f2fs_bug_on was
> triggered as below:
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> kernel BUG at fs/f2fs/inode.c:935!
> Oops: invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI
> CPU: 3 UID: 0 PID: 257 Comm: bash Not tainted 6.13.0-rc1-00033-gc283a70d3497 #5
> RIP: 0010:f2fs_evict_inode+0x50f/0x520
> Call Trace:
> <TASK>
> ? __die_body+0x65/0xb0
> ? die+0x9f/0xc0
> ? do_trap+0xa1/0x170
> ? f2fs_evict_inode+0x50f/0x520
> ? f2fs_evict_inode+0x50f/0x520
> ? handle_invalid_op+0x65/0x80
> ? f2fs_evict_inode+0x50f/0x520
> ? exc_invalid_op+0x39/0x50
> ? asm_exc_invalid_op+0x1a/0x20
> ? __pfx_f2fs_get_dquots+0x10/0x10
> ? f2fs_evict_inode+0x50f/0x520
> ? f2fs_evict_inode+0x2e5/0x520
> evict+0x186/0x2f0
> prune_icache_sb+0x75/0xb0
> super_cache_scan+0x1a8/0x200
> do_shrink_slab+0x163/0x320
> shrink_slab+0x2fc/0x470
> drop_slab+0x82/0xf0
> drop_caches_sysctl_handler+0x4e/0xb0
> proc_sys_call_handler+0x183/0x280
> vfs_write+0x36d/0x450
> ksys_write+0x68/0xd0
> do_syscall_64+0xc8/0x1a0
> ? arch_exit_to_user_mode_prepare+0x11/0x60
> ? irqentry_exit_to_user_mode+0x7e/0xa0
>
> The root cause is: f2fs uses FI_ATOMIC_DIRTIED to indicate dirty
> atomic files during commit. If the inode is dirtied during commit,
> such as by f2fs_i_pino_write, the vfs inode keeps clean and the
> f2fs inode is set to FI_DIRTY_INODE. The FI_DIRTY_INODE flag cann't
> be cleared by write_inode later due to the clean vfs inode. Finally,
> f2fs_bug_on is triggered due to this inconsistent state when evict.
>
> To reproduce this situation:
> - fd = open("/mnt/test.db", O_WRONLY)
> - ioctl(fd, F2FS_IOC_START_ATOMIC_WRITE)
> - mv /mnt/test.db /mnt/test1.db
> - ioctl(fd, F2FS_IOC_COMMIT_ATOMIC_WRITE)
> - echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches
>
> To fix this problem, clear FI_DIRTY_INODE after commit, then
> f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync will ensure a consistent dirty state.
>
> Fixes: fccaa81de87e ("f2fs: prevent atomic file from being dirtied before commit")
> Signed-off-by: Yunlei He <heyunlei@xiaomi.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jianan Huang <huangjianan@xiaomi.com>
> ---
> fs/f2fs/segment.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.c b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> index dc1b47f9269a..71b509a31eae 100644
> --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
> @@ -201,6 +201,7 @@ void f2fs_abort_atomic_write(struct inode *inode, bool clean)
> clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_FILE);
> if (is_inode_flag_set(inode, FI_ATOMIC_DIRTIED)) {
> clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_ATOMIC_DIRTIED);
> + clear_inode_flag(inode, FI_DIRTY_INODE);
Jianan,
Can you please add comments for this change? otherwise it looks good to me.
Thanks,
> f2fs_mark_inode_dirty_sync(inode, true);
> }
> stat_dec_atomic_inode(inode);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-23 9:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-23 7:14 [PATCH] f2fs: fix inconsistent dirty state of atomic file Jianan Huang
2025-01-23 9:49 ` Chao Yu [this message]
2025-01-24 1:51 ` [External Mail]Re: [f2fs-dev] " Huang Jianan
2025-01-24 1:50 ` [PATCH v2] " Jianan Huang
2025-01-24 5:14 ` Chao Yu
2025-01-24 5:50 ` [External Mail]Re: " Huang Jianan
2025-01-24 5:57 ` [PATCH v3] " Jianan Huang
2025-01-24 7:30 ` Chao Yu
2025-01-25 1:20 ` [f2fs-dev] " patchwork-bot+f2fs
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8bee628f-69a4-419e-aaee-c72b7c7861f9@kernel.org \
--to=chao@kernel.org \
--cc=daehojeong@google.com \
--cc=huangjianan@xiaomi.com \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jnhuang95@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=wanghui33@xiaomi.com \
--cc=yudongbin@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox