From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B4A715B0F2; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:38:31 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706546313; cv=none; b=hSc6g1K29+8Q690elht+kvtbP+2trJBUIPjwVFnxcOvTWMvu8prXZy8DxoIXsMIV9IzaMyVvqUo1vL/JRXE4IcPIQiCsDhkGn0zcfFJhzPQaWJTglnmOJSgEUm58zJi8zcxskvT/DoAbo18eXcGxL+icW7lQ4jxfmbJo+k2060c= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1706546313; c=relaxed/simple; bh=W9vkODe01nZU/vsOeFljqJlU/NDJWJCqj+YoON9Vw/o=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=ZjcoSz1WFGJJ/zq4S4Gv7NygwAkGVPIoGpLwHSfiQHkxsEoBRcAVgymx4cLMOktB4V3hzfiRIpOO50G25XSG97eqR5e3F6b5ZYv9JQ7Ag/1wybYCDoEmrhYxiJMQJPZhwQqEskLBCErYApjvFilN8BoktH05BO7xMBhC8r6BerU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=ryz3Ho7x; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="ryz3Ho7x" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1706546309; bh=W9vkODe01nZU/vsOeFljqJlU/NDJWJCqj+YoON9Vw/o=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=ryz3Ho7xG3VZ/wYLhKXp90cwOJ07dcV0//QRevsVQw8Xk0DtIqZGGQdQcypWEi4XG z1El1hlesOFhFoSVgKKoHlv624qElDryQM6P5lya85UF6Rxx/KE6eqnJySdWy58WHc xFs6ZZwU35BmBX2WDySf9HfHmT2M3muyPPPqv1sBN8Y5UmFaB6FJRd/3dhJUldcOAZ HuexK+dRwRxiTuYcLf19UIojelxUE+Sh9CSU0hJvghURFGURV5hDC3gJpj8qxaVRpU GMLvuQtpHIU9Pka/aHWBNDN2gAsxE8yshklBkgotL+a8D++UbLwz2EGGRDGqx2r7Nj 9rxbPS3qdnHJQ== Received: from [100.115.223.179] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cristicc) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30A6C37814A4; Mon, 29 Jan 2024 16:38:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <8c4cfc54-bd23-4d56-a4ae-9f3dd5cedb59@collabora.com> Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2024 18:38:27 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/2] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Add JH7100 SoC compatible Content-Language: en-US To: Andrew Lunn Cc: Krzysztof Kozlowski , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Emil Renner Berthing , Samin Guo , Alexandre Torgue , Jose Abreu , Maxime Coquelin , Giuseppe Cavallaro , Jacob Keller , netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kernel@collabora.com References: <20240126191319.1209821-1-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com> <20240126191319.1209821-2-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com> <0a6f6dcb-18b0-48d5-8955-76bce0e1295d@linaro.org> <56f3bd3c-c099-405b-837b-16d8aeb4cc4b@lunn.ch> From: Cristian Ciocaltea In-Reply-To: <56f3bd3c-c099-405b-837b-16d8aeb4cc4b@lunn.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 1/29/24 15:34, Andrew Lunn wrote: >>> Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski >> >> Thank you for the review! >> >> Could you please apply it to the RESEND version [1] instead, as this one >> had an issue collecting the latest tags, as indicated in [2]. >> >> Regards, >> Cristian > > Hi Cristian > > IT is your job as developers to collect together such reviewed-by: > tags add apply them to the latest version. So long as there are no > major changes, they are still consider applicable. Hi Andrew, Jakub requested a rebase, but I missed a tag and that's why I submitted the RESEND. Now we got this new tag which is not on the RESEND submission, that's why I asked Krzysztof if he could add his R-b on that one. Unless the maintainers' tooling is able to fetch tags from both submissions?! Thanks, Cristian