From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from sipsolutions.net (s3.sipsolutions.net [168.119.38.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A566B1B414E; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 15:42:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745509349; cv=none; b=KyvJ2KM6V69B+Yg/m2k+erOysirxx42WcV/uO6J+wUfsgzvYe5BDxJFSkWmWYwm6yUufOA9jmfD7EVm0BWxU4/rLMinbs95vKRc/zO610vDOousuJWxo+oY2jNN8yg5XSnkqV6e8V0//P71NDuR131rqVy5SRrIfasCKqL+gdys= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1745509349; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OEIq0Q87c6gXNwhDPIX+FKn2LEgNvYm/5NKWTVvThME=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=rd6QXKDnAD1bfjeIgGpJ69roAmze1N1lm7GWcU/z0UBfeUVIr21Yri6LK2rUU7ISVASbvQngrE1L8f3yXhuiW+nwdu9CrLEB3boTAkeDpNuOIjdqP5E6Va5MOq//uzLuTJPfH5Qpmding8RQYbJzkX/rvI3BNfSfab/s7wav0Ks= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b=WPU8wjtb; arc=none smtp.client-ip=168.119.38.16 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sipsolutions.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sipsolutions.net header.i=@sipsolutions.net header.b="WPU8wjtb" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sipsolutions.net; s=mail; h=MIME-Version:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-To: Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID; bh=OEIq0Q87c6gXNwhDPIX+FKn2LEgNvYm/5NKWTVvThME=; t=1745509347; x=1746718947; b=WPU8wjtbHCTaCChe3Yb7jgdzC18ibRitVw6AouDHb+7Fi0n N6B1dQT+7amMQTwqHdRwJKLKUUCo4HAOKa7vwBxhuRwMoec94HOECq/2O6Ty7mB/+6EEb1U4ZxDTy r/gPfi3rMJAFLCu3gncMNAL8kjfG2L49OORCa4fISiKcIW0XV4PoW3G362eGmG2TGHuuP3RKQiSLZ dkySIf+8ESS5tz0Mm0IR/blZdmN4Sye59HKhK5lR9Zl4sGfIEEOYdY9TolrScTnqs4sdlwdZHdqgG +V8j4ubJ/1lmC/aiD4pofjMoyeb5gQqE9cByCtmQEgJp70Qd3wpg+s3zcJGrGsMg==; Received: by sipsolutions.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_X25519__RSA_PSS_RSAE_SHA256__AES_256_GCM:256) (Exim 4.98.1) (envelope-from ) id 1u7yiR-0000000HUGW-2WvG; Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:42:20 +0200 Message-ID: <8d8b7c3ad6a67a683abbb4fc6049898747300a16.camel@sipsolutions.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/5] dt-bindings: wireless: bcm4329-fmac: Use wireless-controller.yaml schema From: Johannes Berg To: Krzysztof Kozlowski , david@ixit.cz, Andrew Lunn , "David S. Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Jakub Kicinski , Paolo Abeni , Rob Herring , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Conor Dooley , Mailing List , Lorenzo Bianconi , van Spriel , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?J=E9r=F4me?= Pouiller , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Andy Gross , Mailing List Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, Janne Grunau Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2025 17:42:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: References: <20250324-dt-bindings-network-class-v5-0-f5c3fe00e8f0@ixit.cz> <20250324-dt-bindings-network-class-v5-3-f5c3fe00e8f0@ixit.cz> <57701e2e-0005-4a8a-a3f5-ba098c97b480@kernel.org> <4b040936baa8fa8669b34e36fe9dff6e08aeede9.camel@sipsolutions.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-malware-bazaar: not-scanned On Thu, 2025-04-24 at 17:37 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > >=20 > > Thanks, I guess I'll hold the pull request for that. And I guess the > > Apple ones are on David then. > I think you can go ahead. I already referenced that commit from next in > my patches, so I hope that SHA will not change (don't rebase your tree): >=20 > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-devicetree/?q=3Df%3Akrzysztof+%22Align+wifi= +node+name+with+bindings%22 >=20 Hm. I thought this patchset broke it, and it is going through my tree. Wouldn't it be much more complex for fixes on top of it to go through another tree? johannes