From: Xin Li <xin@zytor.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: "Aithal, Srikanth" <sraithal@amd.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, x86@kernel.org, will@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, yury.norov@gmail.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
brgerst@gmail.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com,
nik.borisov@suse.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/5] x86/cpufeatures: Generate a feature mask header based on build config
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2025 02:18:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e4e1723-321a-4e8e-bbac-e2e5d8b08bfc@zytor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250303132505.GEZ8WtsXqFpuMOpDjT@fat_crate.local>
On 3/3/2025 5:25 AM, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 04:05:54AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>> "make headers" on an unconfigured tree should presumably only produce the uapi headers, not kernel-internal ones, one could surmise?
>
> Well, that's kinda a question for you guys:
>
> cfc7686900a87 (H. Peter Anvin (Intel) 2025-02-28 00:23:36 -0800 281)archheaders: $(out)/$(featuremasks_hdr)
> 1f57d5d85ba7f (Ingo Molnar 2015-06-03 18:36:41 +0200 282) $(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=arch/x86/entry/syscalls all
>
> and the headers target has
>
> headers: $(version_h) scripts_unifdef uapi-asm-generic archheaders archscripts
>
> as its prereq.
>
> Judging by
>
> 59b2bd05f5f4 ("kbuild: add 'headers' target to build up uapi headers in usr/include")
It seems that 'archprepare' works, however I'm not sure if it's the best
choice. Any suggestion?
diff --git a/arch/x86/Makefile b/arch/x86/Makefile
index 60583987d320..2db535958b8d 100644
--- a/arch/x86/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/Makefile
@@ -276,9 +276,9 @@ $(out)/$(featuremasks_hdr): $(featuremasks_awk)
$(cpufeatures_hdr) $(KCONFIG_CON
$(shell mkdir -p $(out))
$(call if_changed,gen_featuremasks)
-targets += $(out)/$(featuremasks_hdr)
+archprepare: $(out)/$(featuremasks_hdr)
-archheaders: $(out)/$(featuremasks_hdr)
+archheaders:
$(Q)$(MAKE) $(build)=arch/x86/entry/syscalls all
###
>
> it sure looks like "make headers" should be for uapi headers only.
>
> Oh, and it should be documented in "make help" output btw.
Want me to add it btw?
Thanks!
Xin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-04 10:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-28 8:23 [PATCH v6 0/5] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 1/5] x86/cpufeatures: Rename X86_CMPXCHG64 to X86_CX8 Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 16:53 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-02-28 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 2/5] x86/cpufeatures: Add {required,disabled} feature configs Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 16:53 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-03-10 8:18 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpufeatures: Add {REQUIRED,DISABLED} " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-03-10 14:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-10 15:06 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-10 18:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2025-03-19 11:04 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-02-28 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] x86/cpufeatures: Generate a feature mask header based on build config Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 16:53 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for H. Peter Anvin (Intel)
2025-03-03 11:38 ` [PATCH v6 3/5] " Aithal, Srikanth
2025-03-03 12:05 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-03 13:25 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-03 22:34 ` H. Peter Anvin
2025-03-04 10:18 ` Xin Li [this message]
2025-03-04 10:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-05 7:30 ` Xin Li
2025-03-05 22:04 ` Borislav Petkov
2025-03-22 19:58 ` Xin Li
2025-02-28 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 4/5] x86/cpufeatures: Remove {disabled,required}-features.h Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 16:53 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 8:23 ` [PATCH v6 5/5] x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 16:53 ` [tip: x86/cpu] " tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-10 8:18 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/cpufeatures: Use AWK to generate {REQUIRED|DISABLED}_MASK_BIT_SET in <asm/cpufeaturemasks.h> tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2025-03-19 11:03 ` [tip: x86/core] " tip-bot2 for Xin Li (Intel)
2025-02-28 9:26 ` [PATCH v6 0/5] x86/cpufeatures: Automatically generate required and disabled feature masks Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e4e1723-321a-4e8e-bbac-e2e5d8b08bfc@zytor.com \
--to=xin@zytor.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrew.cooper3@citrix.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=brgerst@gmail.com \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=nik.borisov@suse.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=sraithal@amd.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.norov@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox