From: Tianchen Ding <dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
torvalds@linux-foundation.org, paulmck@kernel.org,
rostedt@goodmis.org, mark.rutland@arm.com, juri.lelli@redhat.com,
joel@joelfernandes.org, raghavendra.kt@amd.com,
sshegde@linux.ibm.com, boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com,
konrad.wilk@oracle.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 29/35] sched: handle preempt=voluntary under PREEMPT_AUTO
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 11:20:55 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8e6f02a0-2bd0-4e75-9055-2cb7c508ce4e@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240528003521.979836-30-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
On 2024/5/28 08:35, Ankur Arora wrote:
> The default preemption policy for voluntary preemption under
> PREEMPT_AUTO is to schedule eagerly for tasks of higher scheduling
> class, and lazily for well-behaved, non-idle tasks.
>
> This is the same policy as preempt=none, with an eager handling of
> higher priority scheduling classes.
>
> Comparing a cyclictest workload with a background kernel load of
> 'stress-ng --mmap', shows that both the average and the maximum
> latencies improve:
>
> # stress-ng --mmap 0 &
> # cyclictest --mlockall --smp --priority=80 --interval=200 --distance=0 -q -D 300
>
> Min ( %stdev ) Act ( %stdev ) Avg ( %stdev ) Max ( %stdev )
>
> PREEMPT_AUTO, preempt=voluntary 1.73 ( +- 25.43% ) 62.16 ( +- 303.39% ) 14.92 ( +- 17.96% ) 2778.22 ( +- 15.04% )
> PREEMPT_DYNAMIC, preempt=voluntary 1.83 ( +- 20.76% ) 253.45 ( +- 233.21% ) 18.70 ( +- 15.88% ) 2992.45 ( +- 15.95% )
>
> The table above shows the aggregated latencies across all CPUs.
>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
> Cc: Peter Ziljstra <peterz@infradead.org>
> Cc: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
> Originally-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87jzshhexi.ffs@tglx/
> Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched/core.c | 12 ++++++++----
> kernel/sched/sched.h | 6 ++++++
> 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index c25cccc09b65..2bc3ae21a9d0 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -1052,6 +1052,9 @@ static resched_t resched_opt_translate(struct task_struct *curr,
> if (preempt_model_preemptible())
> return RESCHED_NOW;
>
> + if (preempt_model_voluntary() && opt == RESCHED_PRIORITY)
> + return RESCHED_NOW;
> +
> if (is_idle_task(curr))
> return RESCHED_NOW;
>
> @@ -2289,7 +2292,7 @@ void wakeup_preempt(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int flags)
> if (p->sched_class == rq->curr->sched_class)
> rq->curr->sched_class->wakeup_preempt(rq, p, flags);
> else if (sched_class_above(p->sched_class, rq->curr->sched_class))
> - resched_curr(rq);
> + resched_curr_priority(rq);
>
Besides the conditions about higher class, can we do resched_curr_priority() in the same class?
For example, in fair class, we can do it when SCHED_NORMAL vs SCHED_IDLE.
Maybe sth like
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 41b58387023d..eedb70234bdd 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -8352,6 +8352,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
struct sched_entity *se = &curr->se, *pse = &p->se;
struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq = task_cfs_rq(curr);
int cse_is_idle, pse_is_idle;
+ enum resched_opt opt = RESCHED_PRIORITY;
if (unlikely(se == pse))
return;
@@ -8385,7 +8386,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
/* Idle tasks are by definition preempted by non-idle tasks. */
if (unlikely(task_has_idle_policy(curr)) &&
likely(!task_has_idle_policy(p)))
- goto preempt;
+ goto preempt; /* RESCHED_PRIORITY */
/*
* Batch and idle tasks do not preempt non-idle tasks (their preemption
@@ -8405,7 +8406,7 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
* in the inverse case).
*/
if (cse_is_idle && !pse_is_idle)
- goto preempt;
+ goto preempt; /* RESCHED_PRIORITY */
if (cse_is_idle != pse_is_idle)
return;
@@ -8415,13 +8416,15 @@ static void check_preempt_wakeup_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p, int
/*
* XXX pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) != se ?
*/
- if (pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) == pse)
+ if (pick_eevdf(cfs_rq) == pse) {
+ opt = RESCHED_DEFAULT;
goto preempt;
+ }
return;
preempt:
- resched_curr(rq);
+ __resched_curr(rq, opt);
}
#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-17 3:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 95+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-28 0:34 [PATCH v2 00/35] PREEMPT_AUTO: support lazy rescheduling Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 01/35] sched/core: Move preempt_model_*() helpers from sched.h to preempt.h Ankur Arora
2024-06-06 17:45 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Sean Christopherson
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 02/35] sched/core: Drop spinlocks on contention iff kernel is preemptible Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 03/35] sched: make test_*_tsk_thread_flag() return bool Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 04/35] preempt: introduce CONFIG_PREEMPT_AUTO Ankur Arora
2024-06-03 15:04 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-06-04 17:52 ` Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 05/35] thread_info: selector for TIF_NEED_RESCHED[_LAZY] Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 15:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-30 9:07 ` Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 06/35] thread_info: define __tif_need_resched(resched_t) Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 16:03 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 07/35] sched: define *_tsk_need_resched_lazy() helpers Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 16:09 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-30 9:02 ` Ankur Arora
2024-05-29 8:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-30 9:08 ` Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 08/35] entry: handle lazy rescheduling at user-exit Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 16:12 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 09/35] entry/kvm: handle lazy rescheduling at guest-entry Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 16:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-30 9:04 ` Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 10/35] entry: irqentry_exit only preempts for TIF_NEED_RESCHED Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 16:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-30 9:03 ` Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 11/35] sched: __schedule_loop() doesn't need to check for need_resched_lazy() Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 12/35] sched: separate PREEMPT_DYNAMIC config logic Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 16:25 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-30 9:30 ` Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:34 ` [PATCH v2 13/35] sched: allow runtime config for PREEMPT_AUTO Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 16:27 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-30 9:29 ` Ankur Arora
2024-06-06 11:51 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-06 15:11 ` Ankur Arora
2024-06-06 17:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-09 0:46 ` Ankur Arora
2024-06-12 18:10 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 14/35] rcu: limit PREEMPT_RCU to full preemption under PREEMPT_AUTO Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 15/35] rcu: fix header guard for rcu_all_qs() Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 16/35] preempt,rcu: warn on PREEMPT_RCU=n, preempt=full Ankur Arora
2024-05-29 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-30 18:32 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-30 23:05 ` Ankur Arora
2024-05-30 23:15 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-30 23:04 ` Ankur Arora
2024-05-30 23:20 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-06 11:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-06-06 13:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-17 15:54 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-06-18 16:29 ` Paul E. McKenney
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 17/35] rcu: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPT_COUNT=y Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 18/35] rcu: force context-switch " Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 19/35] x86/thread_info: define TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 20/35] powerpc: add support for PREEMPT_AUTO Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 21/35] sched: prepare for lazy rescheduling in resched_curr() Ankur Arora
2024-05-29 9:32 ` Peter Zijlstra
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 22/35] sched: default preemption policy for PREEMPT_AUTO Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 23/35] sched: handle idle preemption " Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 24/35] sched: schedule eagerly in resched_cpu() Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 25/35] sched/fair: refactor update_curr(), entity_tick() Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 26/35] sched/fair: handle tick expiry under lazy preemption Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 27/35] sched: support preempt=none under PREEMPT_AUTO Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 28/35] sched: support preempt=full " Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 29/35] sched: handle preempt=voluntary " Ankur Arora
2024-06-17 3:20 ` Tianchen Ding [this message]
2024-06-21 18:58 ` Ankur Arora
2024-06-24 2:35 ` Tianchen Ding
2024-06-25 1:12 ` Ankur Arora
2024-06-26 2:43 ` Tianchen Ding
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 30/35] sched: latency warn for TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 31/35] tracing: support lazy resched Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 32/35] Documentation: tracing: add TIF_NEED_RESCHED_LAZY Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 33/35] osnoise: handle quiescent states for PREEMPT_RCU=n, PREEMPTION=y Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 13:12 ` Daniel Bristot de Oliveira
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 34/35] kconfig: decompose ARCH_NO_PREEMPT Ankur Arora
2024-05-28 0:35 ` [PATCH v2 35/35] arch: " Ankur Arora
2024-05-29 6:16 ` [PATCH v2 00/35] PREEMPT_AUTO: support lazy rescheduling Shrikanth Hegde
2024-06-01 11:47 ` Ankur Arora
2024-06-04 7:32 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-06-07 16:48 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-06-10 7:23 ` Ankur Arora
2024-06-15 15:04 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-06-18 18:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-06-19 2:40 ` Ankur Arora
2024-06-24 18:37 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-06-27 2:50 ` Ankur Arora
2024-06-27 5:56 ` Michael Ellerman
2024-06-27 15:44 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-07-03 5:27 ` Ankur Arora
2024-08-12 17:32 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2024-08-12 21:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2024-08-13 5:40 ` Ankur Arora
2024-06-05 15:44 ` Sean Christopherson
2024-06-05 17:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=8e6f02a0-2bd0-4e75-9055-2cb7c508ce4e@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=dtcccc@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=raghavendra.kt@amd.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox