Re: [PATCH v17 1/2] scsi: ufs: Enable power management for wlun

["Asutosh Das (asd)" <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>]

On 4/9/2021 3:07 AM, Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 9/04/21 5:27 am, Daejun Park wrote:
>> Hi Asutosh Das,
>>
>>> During runtime-suspend of ufs host, the scsi devices are
>>> already suspended and so are the queues associated with them.
>>> But the ufs host sends SSU (START_STOP_UNIT) to wlun
>>> during its runtime-suspend.
>>> During the process blk_queue_enter checks if the queue is not in
>>> suspended state. If so, it waits for the queue to resume, and never
>>> comes out of it.
>>> The commit
>>> (d55d15a33: scsi: block: Do not accept any requests while suspended)
>>> adds the check if the queue is in suspended state in blk_queue_enter().
>>>
>>> Call trace:
>>> __switch_to+0x174/0x2c4
>>> __schedule+0x478/0x764
>>> schedule+0x9c/0xe0
>>> blk_queue_enter+0x158/0x228
>>> blk_mq_alloc_request+0x40/0xa4
>>> blk_get_request+0x2c/0x70
>>> __scsi_execute+0x60/0x1c4
>>> ufshcd_set_dev_pwr_mode+0x124/0x1e4
>>> ufshcd_suspend+0x208/0x83c
>>> ufshcd_runtime_suspend+0x40/0x154
>>> ufshcd_pltfrm_runtime_suspend+0x14/0x20
>>> pm_generic_runtime_suspend+0x28/0x3c
>>> __rpm_callback+0x80/0x2a4
>>> rpm_suspend+0x308/0x614
>>> rpm_idle+0x158/0x228
>>> pm_runtime_work+0x84/0xac
>>> process_one_work+0x1f0/0x470
>>> worker_thread+0x26c/0x4c8
>>> kthread+0x13c/0x320
>>> ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
>>>
>>> Fix this by registering ufs device wlun as a scsi driver and
>>> registering it for block runtime-pm. Also make this as a
>>> supplier for all other luns. That way, this device wlun
>>> suspends after all the consumers and resumes after
>>> hba resumes.
>>>
>>> Co-developed-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/cdns-pltfrm.c     |   2 +
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/tc-dwc-g210-pci.c |   2 +
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.c     |   6 +-
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-debugfs.h     |   2 +-
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-exynos.c      |   2 +
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-hisi.c        |   2 +
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-mediatek.c    |  12 +-
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs-qcom.c        |   2 +
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufs_bsg.c         |   6 +-
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd-pci.c      |  36 +--
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c          | 642 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
>>> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h          |   6 +
>>> include/trace/events/ufs.h         |  20 ++
>>> 13 files changed, 509 insertions(+), 231 deletions(-)
>>
>> In this patch, you changed pm_runtime_{get, put}_sync to scsi_autopm_{get, put}_device.
>> But, scsi_autopm_get_device() calls pm_runtime_put_sync() in case of error
>> of pm_runtime_get_sync(). So, pm_runtime_put_sync() can be called twice if
>> scsi_autopm_get_device has error.
> 
> Also it might be tidy to make wrappers e.g.
> 
> static inline int ufshcd_rpm_get_sync(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
>      return pm_runtime_get_sync(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev);
> }
>     
> static inline int ufshcd_rpm_put(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
>      return pm_runtime_put(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev);
> }
> 
> static inline int ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(struct ufs_hba *hba)
> {
>      return pm_runtime_put_sync(&hba->sdev_ufs_device->sdev_gendev);
> }
> 
> And also consider matching: e.g.
> 
> 	pm_runtime_put(hba->dev)	to	ufshcd_rpm_put(hba)
> 	pm_runtime_put_sync(hba->dev)	to	ufshcd_rpm_put_sync(hba)
> 
> 
> 

Ok, I'll push the changes shortly.

-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
Linux Foundation Collaborative Project