From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261377AbULET7w (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:59:52 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261370AbULET7w (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:59:52 -0500 Received: from wproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.184.203]:24511 "EHLO wproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261377AbULET7k (ORCPT ); Sun, 5 Dec 2004 14:59:40 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:references; b=DnwM5J2parK7Jjhi7t34/sL9VDRT3GyGyPQHfJYlWX6Nit9R71q8eI7zdpqrBT8uNXQT/2ITB/CZyPnMGXSXAnrYBoeptAL2+9+zJKI9muoJ3VAg6cRMAlgviKnaQ0KVvivH9BiOEYbsYIcjMbxLHyX8XGmp+/bpt59EeV5bTvw= Message-ID: <8e93903b041205115957fc@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 Dec 2004 19:59:29 +0000 From: Alan Pope Reply-To: Alan Pope To: lkml@think-future.de, Linux Kernel-Liste Subject: Re: Promise module (old) broken In-Reply-To: <20041205195358.DC2B5440E2@service.i-think-future.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20041205195358.DC2B5440E2@service.i-think-future.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:54:00 +0100, lkml@think-future.de wrote: > Hi, > > up to the actual kernel rc 2.6.10rc3 has broken pdc 20265 support. As > some kernel releases ago, one had to specify i/o ports on kernel > cmdline. 2.4.28 kernel works w/o cmdline parameter. > > Is this behaviour intended? Will it be fixed in 2.6.10 release? > > W/o parameter kernel (2.6) does not recognise the pdc ide controller > drives. > dmesg output states: "ideX: Wait for ready failed before probe !" > > As of kernel rc 2.6.10rc1 the kernel even reported ide drive short > read and seek errors on drives even not connected to the pdc > controller but connected to the onboard controller (->/dev/hda1). In > fact /dev/hda1 has no errors (so far). > > Any comments? > It's more broken than that here. I get the following errors in 2.6.8 through 2.6.9-ac9 & 2.6.10-rc2 with the old (PDC202XX_OLD) promise driver, when placing the disk/controller under any load (in fact just doing hdparm -t -T /dev/hde). I get.. hde: dma_intr: status=0xff { Busy } ide: failed opcode was: unknown hde: DMA disabled PDC202XX: Primary channel reset. PDC202XX: Secondary channel reset. (a number of times) ide2: reset timed-out, status=0xff end_request: I/O error, dev hde, sector 11776 Buffer I/O error on device hde, logical block 1472 (many times) Cheers, Al.