public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Where is it written?
Date: 10 Nov 2000 17:06:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8ui631$c1v$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001110184031.A2704@munchkin.spectacle-pond.org> <200011110011.eAB0BbF244111@saturn.cs.uml.edu>

Followup to:  <200011110011.eAB0BbF244111@saturn.cs.uml.edu>
By author:    "Albert D. Cahalan" <acahalan@cs.uml.edu>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
> 
> Gee that looks old. Might there be better calling conventions
> for the Pentium 4 or Athlon? Memory latency, vector registers,
> and more direct access to floating-point registers may mean
> we ought to change the calling conventions. One would start
> with the kernel of course, because it stands alone.
> 

The main win would be passing arguments in registers -- at least three
such registers could be used (%eax, %edx, %ecx) without increasing
register pressure.  Doing this for nonvaradic functions probably would
be a win.  Similarly, floating-point arguments and SSE arguments could
be passed in registers, and _Bool output (a C99 feature) could at
least theoretically be returned in a flag.

	-hpa
-- 
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-11-11  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-11-10 16:37 Where is it written? George Anzinger
2000-11-10 23:40 ` Michael Meissner
2000-11-11  0:11   ` Albert D. Cahalan
2000-11-11  0:27     ` Michael Meissner
2000-11-11  1:10       ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-11  1:28         ` Keith Owens
2000-11-11  1:33           ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-14  1:33             ` Richard Henderson
2000-11-11  5:17           ` Michael Meissner
2000-11-11 14:51             ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-11 15:32       ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-11 23:17         ` Peter Samuelson
2000-11-11 23:30           ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-12  4:54             ` Peter Samuelson
2000-11-12  5:21               ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-12  5:36                 ` Peter Samuelson
2000-11-12  5:55                   ` Keith Owens
2000-11-12  9:35                 ` Andi Kleen
2000-11-12 12:23           ` Andrea Arcangeli
2000-11-13  5:28             ` H. Peter Anvin
2000-11-12 15:35           ` Olaf Titz
2000-11-11  1:06     ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2000-11-10 23:49 ` H. Peter Anvin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='8ui631$c1v$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
    --to=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox