public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	"open list:OPEN FIRMWARE AND FLATTENED DEVICE TREE BINDINGS" 
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>,
	alex.williamson@redhat.com, Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
	sboyd@kernel.org, freedreno <freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
	open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"list@263.net:IOMMU DRIVERS" <iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, robh+dt <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH v17 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:33:15 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9064c01e-cef0-9306-078a-8d303cd6614b@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20181123183555.GE21183@arm.com>



On 11/24/2018 12:06 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 05:32:24PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>> Hi Will,
>>
>> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 11:09 PM Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 04:54:27PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
>>>> From: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
>>>>
>>>> The smmu device probe/remove and add/remove master device callbacks
>>>> gets called when the smmu is not linked to its master, that is without
>>>> the context of the master device. So calling runtime apis in those places
>>>> separately.
>>>> Global locks are also initialized before enabling runtime pm as the
>>>> runtime_resume() calls device_reset() which does tlb_sync_global()
>>>> that ultimately requires locks to be initialized.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sricharan R <sricharan@codeaurora.org>
>>>> [vivek: Cleanup pm runtime calls]
>>>> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Tomasz Figa <tfiga@chromium.org>
>>>> Tested-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>   drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
>>>>   1 file changed, 91 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>>> Given that you're doing the get/put in the TLBI ops unconditionally:
>>>
>>>>   static void arm_smmu_flush_iotlb_all(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>>>>   {
>>>>        struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>>>> +     struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>>>>
>>>> -     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops)
>>>> +     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops) {
>>>> +             arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>>>>                smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_flush_all(smmu_domain);
>>>> +             arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
>>>> +     }
>>>>   }
>>>>
>>>>   static void arm_smmu_iotlb_sync(struct iommu_domain *domain)
>>>>   {
>>>>        struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = to_smmu_domain(domain);
>>>> +     struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>>>>
>>>> -     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops)
>>>> +     if (smmu_domain->tlb_ops) {
>>>> +             arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
>>>>                smmu_domain->tlb_ops->tlb_sync(smmu_domain);
>>>> +             arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
>>>> +     }
>>> Why do you need them around the map/unmap calls as well?
>> We still have .tlb_add_flush path?
> Ok, so we could add the ops around that as well. Right now, we've got
> the runtime pm hooks crossing two parts of the API.

Sure, will do that then, and remove the runtime pm hooks from map/unmap.

Thanks
Vivek
>
> Will


  reply	other threads:[~2018-11-26  6:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-16 11:24 [RESEND PATCH v17 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add runtime pm/sleep support Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add pm_runtime/sleep ops Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Invoke pm_runtime during probe, add/remove device Vivek Gautam
2018-11-21 17:37   ` Will Deacon
2018-11-22 12:02     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-23 18:36       ` Will Deacon
2018-11-26  6:03         ` Vivek Gautam [this message]
2018-11-26 11:26           ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-26 19:31             ` Will Deacon
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add the device_link between masters and smmu Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 4/5] dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add bindings for qcom,smmu-v2 Vivek Gautam
2018-11-16 11:24 ` [RESEND PATCH v17 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: Add support for qcom,smmu-v2 variant Vivek Gautam
2018-11-21 17:38   ` Will Deacon
2018-11-23  9:13     ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-23  9:22       ` Tomasz Figa
2018-11-23  9:36         ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-23 18:34           ` Will Deacon
2018-11-26  4:02             ` Tomasz Figa
2018-11-26 10:55             ` Vivek Gautam
2018-11-26 14:41               ` Thor Thayer
2018-11-26 17:55                 ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9064c01e-cef0-9306-078a-8d303cd6614b@codeaurora.org \
    --to=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox