Re: [PATCH 6/9] tty: n_gsm: increase malformed counter for malformed control frames

["Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>]

On Wed, 5 Apr 2023, D. Starke wrote:

> From: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@siemens.com>
> 
> The malformed counter in gsm_mux is already increased in case of errors
> detected in gsm_queue() and gsm1_receive(). gsm_dlci_command() also
> detects a case for a malformed frame but does not increase the malformed
> counter yet.
> 
> Fix this by also increasing the gsm_mux malformed counter in case of a
> malformed frame in gsm_dlci_command().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Starke <daniel.starke@siemens.com>
> ---
>  drivers/tty/n_gsm.c | 4 +++-
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> index 9f6669686c59..317aa67ed169 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/n_gsm.c
> @@ -2454,8 +2454,10 @@ static void gsm_dlci_command(struct gsm_dlci *dlci, const u8 *data, int len)
>  	data += dlen;
>  
>  	/* Malformed command? */
> -	if (clen > len)
> +	if (clen > len) {
> +		dlci->gsm->malformed++;
>  		return;
> +	}

Should this change have a Fixes: tag? Or is ->malformed just an internal 
variable which is not exposed anywhere (in which case state that in the 
changelog)?


-- 
 i.