public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rong Chen <rong.a.chen@intel.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>, Feng Tang <feng.tang@intel.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	michel@daenzer.net, lkp@01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	dri-devel <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: [LKP] [drm/mgag200] 90f479ae51: vm-scalability.median -18.8% regression
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:37:01 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <90e78ce8-d46a-5154-c324-a05aa1743c98@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44029e80-ba00-8246-dec0-fda122d53f5e@suse.de>

Hi Thomas,

On 8/28/19 1:16 AM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 27.08.19 um 14:33 schrieb Chen, Rong A:
>> Both patches have little impact on the performance from our side.
> Thanks for testing. Too bad they doesn't solve the issue.
>
> There's another patch attached. Could you please tests this as well?
> Thanks a lot!
>
> The patch comes from Daniel Vetter after discussing the problem on IRC.
> The idea of the patch is that the old mgag200 code might display much
> less frames that the generic code, because mgag200 only prints from
> non-atomic context. If we simulate this with the generic code, we should
> see roughly the original performance.
>
>

It's cool, the patch "usecansleep.patch" can fix the issue.

commit:
   f1f8555dfb9 drm/bochs: Use shadow buffer for bochs framebuffer console
   90f479ae51a drm/mgag200: Replace struct mga_fbdev with generic 
framebuffer emulation
   b976b04c2bc only schedule worker from non-atomic context

f1f8555dfb9a70a2  90f479ae51afa45efab97afdde b976b04c2bcf33148d6c7bc1a2  
testcase/testparams/testbox
----------------  -------------------------- --------------------------  
---------------------------
          %stddev      change         %stddev      change %stddev
              \          |                \          | \
      42912             -15%      36517 44093 
vm-scalability/performance-300s-8T-anon-cow-seq-hugetlb/lkp-knm01
      42912             -15%      36517 44093        GEO-MEAN 
vm-scalability.median

Best Regards,
Rong Chen

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-28  9:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-07-29  9:51 [drm/mgag200] 90f479ae51: vm-scalability.median -18.8% regression kernel test robot
     [not found] ` <1c0bf22b-2c69-6b45-f700-ed832a3a5c17@suse.de>
     [not found]   ` <14fdaaed-51c8-b270-b46b-cba7b5c4ba52@suse.de>
     [not found]     ` <20190805070200.GA91650@shbuild999.sh.intel.com>
     [not found]       ` <c0c3f387-dc93-3146-788c-23258b28a015@intel.com>
     [not found]         ` <045a23ab-78f7-f363-4a2e-bf24a7a2f79e@suse.de>
     [not found]           ` <37ae41e4-455d-c18d-5c93-7df854abfef9@intel.com>
     [not found]             ` <370747ca-4dc9-917b-096c-891dcc2aedf0@suse.de>
     [not found]               ` <c6e220fe-230c-265c-f2fc-b0948d1cb898@intel.com>
     [not found]                 ` <20190812072545.GA63191@shbuild999.sh.intel.com>
2019-08-13  9:36                   ` [LKP] " Feng Tang
2019-08-16  6:55                     ` Feng Tang
2019-08-22 17:25                     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2019-08-22 20:02                       ` Dave Airlie
2019-08-23  9:54                         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2019-08-24  5:16                       ` Feng Tang
2019-08-26 10:50                         ` Thomas Zimmermann
2019-08-27 12:33                           ` Chen, Rong A
2019-08-27 17:16                             ` Thomas Zimmermann
2019-08-28  9:37                               ` Rong Chen [this message]
2019-08-28 10:51                                 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2019-09-04  6:27                                   ` Feng Tang
2019-09-04  6:53                                     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2019-09-04  8:11                                       ` Daniel Vetter
2019-09-04  8:35                                         ` Feng Tang
2019-09-04  8:43                                           ` Thomas Zimmermann
2019-09-04  9:17                                           ` Daniel Vetter
2019-09-04 11:15                                             ` Dave Airlie
2019-09-04 11:20                                               ` Daniel Vetter
2019-09-05  6:59                                                 ` Feng Tang
2019-09-05 10:37                                                   ` Daniel Vetter
2019-09-05 10:48                                                     ` Feng Tang
2019-09-09 14:12                                     ` Thomas Zimmermann
2019-09-16  9:06                                       ` Feng Tang
2019-09-17  8:48                                         ` Thomas Zimmermann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=90e78ce8-d46a-5154-c324-a05aa1743c98@intel.com \
    --to=rong.a.chen@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=feng.tang@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@01.org \
    --cc=michel@daenzer.net \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox