From: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
To: Yan Zhao <yan.y.zhao@intel.com>,
dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
seanjc@google.com
Cc: tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, kas@kernel.org,
x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
kai.huang@intel.com, rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com,
yilun.xu@linux.intel.com, vannapurve@google.com,
ackerleytng@google.com, sagis@google.com,
binbin.wu@linux.intel.com, isaku.yamahata@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/tdx: Use PFN directly for unmapping guest private memory
Date: Thu, 7 May 2026 15:54:20 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90e91a3c-3f5d-454c-878f-335b19af71c3@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260430014948.24226-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
On 4/30/2026 9:49 AM, Yan Zhao wrote:
> From: Sean Christopherson<seanjc@google.com>
>
> Remove struct page assumptions/constraints in APIs for unmapping guest
> private memory and have them take physical address directly.
>
> Having core TDX make assumptions that guest private memory must be backed
> by struct page (and/or folio) will create subtle dependencies on how
> KVM/guest_memfd allocates/manages memory (e.g., whether it uses memory
> allocated from core MM, if the memory is refcounted, or if the folio is
> split) that are easily avoided. [1].
>
> KVM's MMUs work with PFNs. This is very much an intentional design choice.
> It ensures that the KVM MMUs remain flexible and are not too tightly tied
> to the regular CPU MMUs and the kernel code around them. Using
> "struct page" for TDX guest memory is not a good fit anywhere near the KVM
> MMU code [2].
>
> Therefore, for unmapping guest private memory: export
> tdx_quirk_reset_paddr() for direct KVM invocation, and convert the SEAMCALL
> wrapper API tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_hkid() to take PFN as input (thus
> updating mk_keyed_paddr() and tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_tdr()).
>
> Intentionally have KVM pass PAGE_SIZE (rather than KVM_HPAGE_SIZE(level))
> to tdx_quirk_reset_paddr() in tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() to avoid
> mixing in huge page changes. The KVM_BUG_ON() check for !PG_LEVEL_4K in
> tdx_sept_remove_private_spte() justifies using PAGE_SIZE.
>
> Do not convert tdx_reclaim_page() to use PFN as input since it currently
> does not remove guest private memory.
>
> Use "kvm_pfn_t pfn" for type safety. Using this KVM type is appropriate
> since APIs tdh_phymem_page_wbinvd_hkid() and tdx_quirk_reset_paddr() are
> exported to KVM only.
>
> [Yan: Use kvm_pfn_t,exclude tdx_reclaim_page(),use tdx_quirk_reset_paddr()]
>
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson<seanjc@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yan Zhao<yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
> Link:https://lore.kernel.org/all/aWgyhmTJphGQqO0Y@google.com [1]
> Link:https://lore.kernel.org/all/ac7V0g2q2hN3dU5u@google.com [2]
Reviewed-by: Xiaoyao Li <xiaoyao.li@intel.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-07 7:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20260430014852.24183-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
[not found] ` <20260430014929.24210-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
2026-05-07 7:49 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/tdx: Use PFN directly for mapping guest private memory Xiaoyao Li
2026-05-07 8:08 ` Yan Zhao
2026-05-07 18:46 ` Sean Christopherson
[not found] ` <20260430014948.24226-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
2026-05-07 7:54 ` Xiaoyao Li [this message]
[not found] ` <20260430015001.24242-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
2026-05-07 8:02 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/tdx: Drop exported function tdx_quirk_reset_page() Xiaoyao Li
[not found] ` <20260430015014.24261-1-yan.y.zhao@intel.com>
2026-05-07 8:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/virt/tdx: Move mk_keyed_paddr() to tdx.c due to no external users Xiaoyao Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90e91a3c-3f5d-454c-878f-335b19af71c3@intel.com \
--to=xiaoyao.li@intel.com \
--cc=ackerleytng@google.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=isaku.yamahata@intel.com \
--cc=kai.huang@intel.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=sagis@google.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vannapurve@google.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yan.y.zhao@intel.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox