From: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>
To: Sudheesh Mavila <sudheesh.mavila@amd.com>,
andrew@lunn.ch, f.fainelli@gmail.com, linux@armlinux.org.uk,
davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: phy: corrected the return value for genphy_check_and_restart_aneg
Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 14:59:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <90fc4cb6-d11b-20d0-a1fa-28e0564a425b@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200225122208.6881-1-sudheesh.mavila@amd.com>
On 25.02.2020 13:22, Sudheesh Mavila wrote:
> When auto-negotiation is not required, return value should be zero.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sudheesh Mavila <sudheesh.mavila@amd.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c | 9 ++++++---
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> index 6a5056e0ae77..36cde3dac4c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/phy/phy_device.c
> @@ -1806,10 +1806,13 @@ int genphy_check_and_restart_aneg(struct phy_device *phydev, bool restart)
> restart = true;
> }
>
> - if (restart)
> - ret = genphy_restart_aneg(phydev);
> + /* Only restart aneg if we are advertising something different
> + * than we were before.
> + */
> + if (restart > 0)
In addition to what Russell and Andrew commented already:
- You shouldn't compare a bool with an int. There's no need to change
the original condition.
- The comment isn't really needed, and it's wrong. See the comment few
lines earlier.
- After this change the initialization of ret isn't needed any longer.
> + return genphy_restart_aneg(phydev);
>
> - return ret;
> + return 0;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(genphy_check_and_restart_aneg);
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-25 13:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-25 12:22 [PATCH] net: phy: corrected the return value for genphy_check_and_restart_aneg Sudheesh Mavila
2020-02-25 12:38 ` Russell King - ARM Linux admin
2020-02-25 13:28 ` Andrew Lunn
2020-02-25 13:59 ` Heiner Kallweit [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=90fc4cb6-d11b-20d0-a1fa-28e0564a425b@gmail.com \
--to=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sudheesh.mavila@amd.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox