From: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
To: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>, <oleg@redhat.com>,
<tglx@linutronix.de>, <peterz@infradead.org>, <luto@kernel.org>,
<shuah@kernel.org>, <kees@kernel.org>, <wad@chromium.org>,
<deller@gmx.de>, <macro@orcam.me.uk>, <charlie@rivosinc.com>,
<kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, <ldv@strace.io>, <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
<song@kernel.org>, <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
<ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>, <broonie@kernel.org>,
<pengcan@kylinos.cn>, <dvyukov@google.com>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 04/16] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit()
Date: Mon, 8 Dec 2025 14:24:41 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9102697c-9159-395d-e1b5-78439aa5a8b9@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <dd3a1421-dfb0-445e-b2f7-7c273fa4a020@arm.com>
On 2025/12/8 13:48, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> On 04/12/25 1:51 PM, Jinjie Ruan wrote:
>> The generic syscall entry code has the following form, which use
>> the input syscall work flag and syscall number:
>>
>> | syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall,
>> | unsigned long work)
>> |
>> | syscall_exit_work(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long work)
>>
>> In preparation for moving arm64 over to the generic entry code,
>> refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit() to also pass thread flags, and
>> get syscall number by syscall_get_nr() helper.
>>
>> No functional changes.
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Jinjie Ruan <ruanjinjie@huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h | 4 ++--
>> arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++---------
>> arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c | 5 +++--
>> 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
>> index 5e4c7fc44f73..cef1d9ce6e1b 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/syscall.h
>> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ static inline int syscall_get_arch(struct task_struct *task)
>> return AUDIT_ARCH_AARCH64;
>> }
>>
>> -int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> -void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> +int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall, unsigned long flags);
>> +void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long flags);
>>
>> #endif /* __ASM_SYSCALL_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>> index 3926ce6aa268..b962cbcca11d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/ptrace.c
>> @@ -2381,9 +2381,8 @@ static void report_syscall_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> }
>> }
>>
>> -int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs, long syscall, unsigned long flags)
>> {
>> - unsigned long flags = read_thread_flags();
>> int ret;
>>
>> if (flags & (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE)) {
>> @@ -2396,19 +2395,27 @@ int syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> if (secure_computing() == -1)
>> return NO_SYSCALL;
>>
>> - if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT))
>> - trace_sys_enter(regs, regs->syscallno);
>> + /* Either of the above might have changed the syscall number */
>> + syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, regs);
>>
>> - audit_syscall_entry(regs->syscallno, regs->orig_x0, regs->regs[1],
>> + if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)) {
>> + trace_sys_enter(regs, syscall);
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Probes or BPF hooks in the tracepoint may have changed the
>> + * system call number as well.
>> + */
>> + syscall = syscall_get_nr(current, regs);
>> + }
>> +
>> + audit_syscall_entry(syscall, regs->orig_x0, regs->regs[1],
>> regs->regs[2], regs->regs[3]);
>>
>> - return regs->syscallno;
>> + return syscall;
>
> regs->syscallno still remains unchanged even if syscall is evaluated to be different ?
No, arm64 syscall_get_nr() returns regs->syscallno, use syscall_get_nr()
helper here to get the local "syscall" is to stay consistent with the
generic entry, without any semantic change.
23 static inline int syscall_get_nr(struct task_struct *task,
24 >------->------->------->------- struct pt_regs *regs)
25 {
26 >-------return regs->syscallno;
27 }
>
>> }
>>
>> -void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +void syscall_trace_exit(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long flags)
>> {
>> - unsigned long flags = read_thread_flags();
>> -
>> audit_syscall_exit(regs);
>>
>> if (flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT)
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
>> index aba7ca6bca2d..ec31f82d2e9f 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c
>> @@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ static void el0_svc_common(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno, int sc_nr,
>> */
>> if (scno == NO_SYSCALL)
>> syscall_set_return_value(current, regs, -ENOSYS, 0);
>> - scno = syscall_trace_enter(regs);
>> + scno = syscall_trace_enter(regs, scno, flags);
>> if (scno == NO_SYSCALL)
>> goto trace_exit;
>> }
>> @@ -143,7 +143,8 @@ static void el0_svc_common(struct pt_regs *regs, int scno, int sc_nr,
>> }
>>
>> trace_exit:
>> - syscall_trace_exit(regs);
>> + flags = read_thread_flags();
>> + syscall_trace_exit(regs, flags);
>> }
>>
>> void do_el0_svc(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-12-08 6:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-04 8:21 [PATCH v9 00/16] arm64: entry: Convert to Generic Entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 01/16] arm64: Remove unused _TIF_WORK_MASK Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-08 4:42 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 02/16] arm64/ptrace: Split report_syscall() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-08 5:02 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 03/16] arm64/ptrace: Return early for ptrace_report_syscall_entry() error Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-08 5:24 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-08 6:31 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-09 13:46 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-12 4:00 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-15 15:24 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 04/16] arm64/ptrace: Refactor syscall_trace_enter/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-08 5:48 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-12-08 6:24 ` Jinjie Ruan [this message]
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 05/16] arm64: ptrace: Move rseq_syscall() before audit_syscall_exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 06/16] arm64: syscall: Rework el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 07/16] arm64/ptrace: Not check _TIF_SECCOMP/SYSCALL_EMU for syscall_exit_work() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 08/16] arm64/ptrace: Do not report_syscall_exit() for PTRACE_SYSEMU_SINGLESTEP Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 09/16] arm64/ptrace: Expand secure_computing() in place Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 10/16] arm64/ptrace: Use syscall_get_arguments() helper Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 11/16] entry: Split syscall_exit_to_user_mode_work() for arch reuse Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 12/16] entry: Add arch_ptrace_report_syscall_entry/exit() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 13/16] arm64: entry: Convert to generic entry Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-09 13:47 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 14/16] arm64: Inline el0_svc_common() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-09 13:48 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-10 2:56 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 15/16] entry: Inline syscall_exit_work() Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-09 13:48 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-11 6:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-12-11 9:52 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-12-12 1:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-12-12 1:26 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-12 3:49 ` Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-04 8:21 ` [PATCH v9 16/16] selftests: sud_test: Support aarch64 Jinjie Ruan
2025-12-20 14:53 ` kemal
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9102697c-9159-395d-e1b5-78439aa5a8b9@huawei.com \
--to=ruanjinjie@huawei.com \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=charlie@rivosinc.com \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=ldv@strace.io \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=macro@orcam.me.uk \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=pengcan@kylinos.cn \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wad@chromium.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox