From: Ethan Zhao <haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>, iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Remove caching mode check before device TLB flush
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2024 14:30:38 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <916dbee7-5ab1-4def-91fe-546e6ab974de@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <da521760-c2d7-432e-8ace-8793d520ab09@linux.intel.com>
On 4/16/2024 10:57 AM, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 4/16/24 8:53 AM, Ethan Zhao wrote:
>> On 4/15/2024 9:38 AM, Lu Baolu wrote:
>>> The Caching Mode (CM) of the Intel IOMMU indicates if the hardware
>>> implementation caches not-present or erroneous translation-structure
>>> entries except for the first-stage translation. The caching mode is
>>> irrelevant to the device TLB, therefore there is no need to check it
>>> before a device TLB invalidation operation.
>>>
>>> Remove two caching mode checks before device TLB invalidation in the
>>> driver. The removal of these checks doesn't change the driver's
>>> behavior
>>> in critical map/unmap paths. Hence, there is no functionality or
>>> performance impact, especially since commit <29b32839725f>
>>> ("iommu/vt-d:
>>> Do not use flush-queue when caching-mode is on") has already disabled
>>> flush-queue for caching mode. Therefore, caching mode will never call
>>> intel_flush_iotlb_all().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>> Reviewed-by: Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c | 9 ++-------
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> Change log:
>>> v3:
>>> - It turned out that the removals don't change the driver's behavior,
>>> hence change it from a fix patch to a cleanup one.
>>> - No functionality changes.
>>> v2:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240410055823.264501-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/
>>> - Squash two patches into a single one.
>>> - No functionality changes.
>>> v1:
>>> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20240407144232.190355-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> index a7ecd90303dc..f0a67e9d9faf 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/intel/iommu.c
>>> @@ -1501,11 +1501,7 @@ static void iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(struct
>>> intel_iommu *iommu,
>>> else
>>> __iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(iommu, did, pfn, pages, ih);
>>> - /*
>>> - * In caching mode, changes of pages from non-present to
>>> present require
>>> - * flush. However, device IOTLB doesn't need to be flushed in
>>> this case.
>>> - */
>>> - if (!cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap) || !map)
>>> + if (!map)
>>> iommu_flush_dev_iotlb(domain, addr, mask);
>>> }
>>
>> Given devTLB flushing is irrelavent to CM, put iommu_flush_dev_iotlb()
>> in iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() and called with CM checking context is not
>> reasonable. the logic is buggy.
>>
>> static void __mapping_notify_one(struct intel_iommu *iommu, struct
>> dmar_domain *domain,
>> unsigned long pfn, unsigned int pages)
>> {
>> /*
>> * It's a non-present to present mapping. Only flush if caching
>> mode
>> * and second level.
>> */
>> if (cap_caching_mode(iommu->cap) && !domain->use_first_level)
>> iommu_flush_iotlb_psi(iommu, domain, pfn, pages, 0, 1);
>> else
>> iommu_flush_write_buffer(iommu);
>>
>>
>> then how about fold all CM checking logic in iommu_flush_iotlb_psi()
>> or speperate iommu_flush_dev_iotlb() from iommu_flush_iotlb_psi() ?
>
> I am refactoring the code with a new series.
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20240410020844.253535-1-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/
>
Great, thx.
>
> Best regards,
> baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-16 6:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-15 1:38 [PATCH v3 1/1] iommu/vt-d: Remove caching mode check before device TLB flush Lu Baolu
2024-04-15 2:22 ` Zhang, Tina
2024-04-15 2:43 ` Yi Liu
2024-04-15 5:00 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-15 6:56 ` Yi Liu
2024-04-16 3:00 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-17 3:40 ` Yi Liu
2024-04-16 0:53 ` Ethan Zhao
2024-04-16 2:57 ` Baolu Lu
2024-04-16 6:30 ` Ethan Zhao [this message]
2024-04-24 3:41 ` Baolu Lu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=916dbee7-5ab1-4def-91fe-546e6ab974de@linux.intel.com \
--to=haifeng.zhao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox