From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>, Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>
Cc: Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>,
hch@lst.de, bmarzins@redhat.com,
Bryan Gurney <bgurney@redhat.com>,
linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Marco Patalano <mpatalan@redhat.com>,
axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: remove multipath module parameter
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2025 10:55:21 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <91ae613a-7b56-4ca0-b91c-6bc1eee798b8@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Z7dct_AbaSO7uZ2h@kbusch-mbp>
On 2/20/25 17:47, Keith Busch wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 20, 2025 at 01:05:04PM +0200, Sagi Grimberg wrote:
>> This discussion is not specific to RHEL, if there is a real use-case
>> that we are interested in supporting, we can change our minds and keep
>> it (and simply remove the log msg), but I haven't heard any real life
>> use-cases thus far.
>
> One use case: ublk.
>
> Other use cases are manufacturing and debugging. Linux has been a great
> environment for both, which don't want anything hidden behind virtual
> devices.
>
> The module parameter makes it possible to do this with your distro's
> stock kernel that came with the CONFIG option enabled.
>
> The device mapper multipath needed some layering violations out of the
> driver to make failover work correctly/better. That's one reason it's
> not supported here, and that's an appropriate place to draw the line on
> what kinds of patches should be accepted.
>
Plus there are some NVMe devices out there which _despite_ being PCIe do
report NMIC and CMIC set (I won't name names, if you came across them
you'll know). This is causing stacking drivers (most notably MD) to
behave vastly different on hotplug. Having the module option is an easy
way of debugging (and, in quite some cases, fixing) the issue.
If the module option really causes issues just make it read-only; that
way you can still set if if absolutely required, and at the same time
catch installations which try to modify it.
Cheers,
Hannes
--
Dr. Hannes Reinecke Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Frankenstr. 146, 90461 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), GF: I. Totev, A. McDonald, W. Knoblich
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-02-26 9:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-04 21:11 [PATCH] nvme: remove multipath module parameter Bryan Gurney
2025-02-13 20:37 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-17 8:08 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-02-17 16:14 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 8:19 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-02-18 14:05 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 14:57 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 15:06 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-18 16:31 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 17:15 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-18 23:06 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 23:30 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-19 14:47 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-02-20 11:05 ` Sagi Grimberg
2025-02-20 16:47 ` Keith Busch
2025-02-26 9:55 ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2025-03-05 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 15:17 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-05 23:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-05 23:57 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-06 0:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-06 0:15 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-06 7:12 ` Hannes Reinecke
2025-03-06 14:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-06 15:01 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-06 15:16 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-07 0:46 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-07 15:19 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-03-07 15:43 ` Keith Busch
2025-03-09 17:23 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-03-10 13:29 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 3:47 ` John Meneghini
2025-03-12 15:26 ` Nilay Shroff
2025-03-10 13:28 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-03-12 3:08 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 14:26 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 16:41 ` John Meneghini
2025-02-18 14:43 ` John Meneghini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=91ae613a-7b56-4ca0-b91c-6bc1eee798b8@suse.de \
--to=hare@suse.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=bgurney@redhat.com \
--cc=bmarzins@redhat.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mpatalan@redhat.com \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox