The Linux Kernel Mailing List
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Doug Thompson <norsk5@yahoo.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, dougthompson@xmission.com
Cc: Peter Tyser <ptyser@xes-inc.com>,
	alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] EDAC Add e752x parameter for sysbus_parity selection
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2008 14:48:02 -0700 (PDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <920687.59522.qm@web50104.mail.re2.yahoo.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080321143524.318d002a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>

Peter Tyser,

can you look into this, as it is your requirement, for a possible better solution with those on
the CC list? 

Thanks

Thanks Andrew for the notice.

doug t



--- Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 14:55:59 -0600
> dougthompson@xmission.com wrote:
> 
> > +/* Setup system bus parity mask register.
> > + * Sysbus parity supported on:
> > + *   e7320/e7520/e7525 + Xeon
> > + *   i3100 + Xeon/Celeron
> > + * Sysbus parity not supported on:
> > + *   i3100 + Pentium M/Celeron M/Core Duo/Core2 Duo
> > + */
> > +static void e752x_init_sysbus_parity_mask(struct e752x_pvt *pvt)
> > +{
> > +	char *cpu_id = cpu_data(0).x86_model_id;
> > +	struct pci_dev *dev = pvt->dev_d0f1;
> > +	int enable = 1;
> > +
> > +	/* Allow module paramter override, else see if CPU supports parity */
> > +	if (sysbus_parity != -1) {
> > +		enable = sysbus_parity;
> > +	} else if (cpu_id[0] &&
> > +		   ((strstr(cpu_id, "Pentium") && strstr(cpu_id, " M ")) ||
> > +		    (strstr(cpu_id, "Celeron") && strstr(cpu_id, " M ")) ||
> > +		    (strstr(cpu_id, "Core") && strstr(cpu_id, "Duo")))) {
> > +		e752x_printk(KERN_INFO, "System Bus Parity not "
> > +			     "supported by CPU, disabling\n");
> > +		enable = 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	if (enable)
> > +		pci_write_config_word(dev, E752X_SYSBUS_ERRMASK, 0x0000);
> > +	else
> > +		pci_write_config_word(dev, E752X_SYSBUS_ERRMASK, 0x0309);
> > +}
> 
> Is that the best way of working out whether the CPU supports system bus
> parity?  We do have cpu capability infrastructure in x86 core and I'd have
> thought it would be better for x86 core to work this out, set the suitable
> flag and have clients (ie: EDAC) test that flag?
> 
> 


W1DUG

  reply	other threads:[~2008-03-21 22:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-03-19 20:55 [PATCH 3/3] EDAC Add e752x parameter for sysbus_parity selection dougthompson
2008-03-21 21:35 ` Andrew Morton
2008-03-21 21:48   ` Doug Thompson [this message]
2008-03-21 22:56     ` Peter Tyser

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=920687.59522.qm@web50104.mail.re2.yahoo.com \
    --to=norsk5@yahoo.com \
    --cc=ak@suse.de \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
    --cc=dougthompson@xmission.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=ptyser@xes-inc.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox