public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] rseq: Avoid infinite recursion when delivering SIGSEGV
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 10:44:37 -0400 (EDT)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <92378910.863.1529592277773.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1529582080-31430-1-git-send-email-will.deacon@arm.com>

----- On Jun 21, 2018, at 7:54 AM, Will Deacon will.deacon@arm.com wrote:

> When delivering a signal to a task that is using rseq, we call into
> __rseq_handle_notify_resume() so that the registers pushed in the
> sigframe are updated to reflect the state of the restartable sequence
> (for example, ensuring that the signal returns to the abort handler if
> necessary).
> 
> However, if the rseq management fails due to an unrecoverable fault when
> accessing userspace or certain combinations of RSEQ_CS_* flags, then we
> will attempt to deliver a SIGSEGV. This has the potential for infinite
> recursion if the rseq code continuously fails on signal delivery.
> 
> Avoid this problem by using force_sigsegv() instead of force_sig(), which
> is explicitly designed to reset the SEGV handler to SIG_DFL in the case
> of a recursive fault. In doing so, remove rseq_signal_deliver() from the
> internal rseq API and have an optional struct ksignal * parameter to
> rseq_handle_notify_resume() instead.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
> ---
> 
> RFC v1 -> v2: Kill rseq_signal_deliver()

I actually meant to kill _rseq_handle_notify_resume introduced by
your patch, not rseq_signal_deliver().

Please keep rseq_signal_deliver() as a static inline, and just remove
the _rseq_handle_notify_resume() by changing the signature of
rseq_handle_notify_resume to take an extra sig argument (which can
be NULL).

Thanks,

Mathieu

> 
> arch/arm/kernel/signal.c     |  4 ++--
> arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c |  4 ++--
> arch/x86/entry/common.c      |  2 +-
> arch/x86/kernel/signal.c     |  2 +-
> include/linux/sched.h        | 27 ++++++++++++---------------
> kernel/rseq.c                |  7 ++++---
> 6 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> index f09e9d66d605..184f69dcb9f2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -544,7 +544,7 @@ static void handle_signal(struct ksignal *ksig, struct
> pt_regs *regs)
> 	 * Increment event counter and perform fixup for the pre-signal
> 	 * frame.
> 	 */
> -	rseq_signal_deliver(regs);
> +	rseq_handle_notify_resume(ksig, regs);
> 
> 	/*
> 	 * Set up the stack frame
> @@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ do_work_pending(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned int
> thread_flags, int syscall)
> 			} else {
> 				clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> 				tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
> -				rseq_handle_notify_resume(regs);
> +				rseq_handle_notify_resume(NULL, regs);
> 			}
> 		}
> 		local_irq_disable();
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> index 17fe4339ba59..88bdf243a5bd 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ static void do_signal(struct task_struct *tsk)
> 	/* Re-enable the breakpoints for the signal stack */
> 	thread_change_pc(tsk, tsk->thread.regs);
> 
> -	rseq_signal_deliver(tsk->thread.regs);
> +	rseq_handle_notify_resume(&ksig, tsk->thread.regs);
> 
> 	if (is32) {
>         	if (ksig.ka.sa.sa_flags & SA_SIGINFO)
> @@ -170,7 +170,7 @@ void do_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs, unsigned long
> thread_info_flags)
> 	if (thread_info_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
> 		clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> 		tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
> -		rseq_handle_notify_resume(regs);
> +		rseq_handle_notify_resume(NULL, regs);
> 	}
> 
> 	user_enter();
> diff --git a/arch/x86/entry/common.c b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> index 92190879b228..3b2490b81918 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/entry/common.c
> @@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void exit_to_usermode_loop(struct pt_regs *regs, u32
> cached_flags)
> 		if (cached_flags & _TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME) {
> 			clear_thread_flag(TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> 			tracehook_notify_resume(regs);
> -			rseq_handle_notify_resume(regs);
> +			rseq_handle_notify_resume(NULL, regs);
> 		}
> 
> 		if (cached_flags & _TIF_USER_RETURN_NOTIFY)
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
> index 445ca11ff863..8affeeb74935 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal.c
> @@ -692,7 +692,7 @@ setup_rt_frame(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
> 	 * Increment event counter and perform fixup for the pre-signal
> 	 * frame.
> 	 */
> -	rseq_signal_deliver(regs);
> +	rseq_handle_notify_resume(ksig, regs);
> 
> 	/* Set up the stack frame */
> 	if (is_ia32_frame(ksig)) {
> diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
> index 87bf02d93a27..fd23a540cd8d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/sched.h
> +++ b/include/linux/sched.h
> @@ -1799,20 +1799,19 @@ static inline void rseq_set_notify_resume(struct
> task_struct *t)
> 		set_tsk_thread_flag(t, TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME);
> }
> 
> -void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct ksignal *sig, struct pt_regs *regs);
> 
> -static inline void rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static inline void rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct ksignal *ksig,
> +					     struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> -	if (current->rseq)
> -		__rseq_handle_notify_resume(regs);
> -}
> +	if (ksig) {
> +		preempt_disable();
> +		__set_bit(RSEQ_EVENT_SIGNAL_BIT, &current->rseq_event_mask);
> +		preempt_enable();
> +	}
> 
> -static inline void rseq_signal_deliver(struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> -	preempt_disable();
> -	__set_bit(RSEQ_EVENT_SIGNAL_BIT, &current->rseq_event_mask);
> -	preempt_enable();
> -	rseq_handle_notify_resume(regs);
> +	if (current->rseq)
> +		__rseq_handle_notify_resume(ksig, regs);
> }
> 
> /* rseq_preempt() requires preemption to be disabled. */
> @@ -1864,10 +1863,8 @@ static inline void rseq_execve(struct task_struct *t)
> static inline void rseq_set_notify_resume(struct task_struct *t)
> {
> }
> -static inline void rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs)
> -{
> -}
> -static inline void rseq_signal_deliver(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +static inline void rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct ksignal *ksig,
> +					     struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> }
> static inline void rseq_preempt(struct task_struct *t)
> diff --git a/kernel/rseq.c b/kernel/rseq.c
> index ae306f90c514..22b6acf1ad63 100644
> --- a/kernel/rseq.c
> +++ b/kernel/rseq.c
> @@ -251,10 +251,10 @@ static int rseq_ip_fixup(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  * respect to other threads scheduled on the same CPU, and with respect
>  * to signal handlers.
>  */
> -void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct ksignal *ksig, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> 	struct task_struct *t = current;
> -	int ret;
> +	int ret, sig;
> 
> 	if (unlikely(t->flags & PF_EXITING))
> 		return;
> @@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ void __rseq_handle_notify_resume(struct pt_regs *regs)
> 	return;
> 
> error:
> -	force_sig(SIGSEGV, t);
> +	sig = ksig ? ksig->sig : 0;
> +	force_sigsegv(sig, t);
> }
> 
> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RSEQ
> --
> 2.1.4

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-06-21 14:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21 11:54 [PATCH v2] rseq: Avoid infinite recursion when delivering SIGSEGV Will Deacon
2018-06-21 14:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2018-06-21 14:57   ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=92378910.863.1529592277773.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox