From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 03:10:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 03:09:58 -0400 Received: from t2.redhat.com ([199.183.24.243]:58358 "EHLO passion.cambridge.redhat.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Thu, 31 May 2001 03:09:39 -0400 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3 01/15/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 From: David Woodhouse X-Accept-Language: en_GB In-Reply-To: <200105302301.QAA08564@csl.Stanford.EDU> In-Reply-To: <200105302301.QAA08564@csl.Stanford.EDU> To: Dawson Engler Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mc@CS.Stanford.EDU Subject: Re: [CHECKER] 2.4.5-ac4 non-init functions calling init functions Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 31 May 2001 08:09:05 +0100 Message-ID: <9262.991292945@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org engler@csl.Stanford.EDU said: > It's a space/performance bug, though, right? From the original mail: > 1. The best case: the caller should actually be an __init function > as well. This is a performance bug since it won't be freed. Yes, sorry. I hadn't properly read the beginning or your mail - I'd skipped straight to checking whether anything I own had been listed. :) -- dwmw2