* Re: [patch 3/3] genirq: introduce IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED flag for request_irq() [not found] <201003112209.o2BM91oQ013581@imap1.linux-foundation.org> @ 2010-03-13 19:56 ` Thomas Gleixner 2010-03-16 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-03-13 19:56 UTC (permalink / raw) To: akpm; +Cc: Ingo Molnar, maz, joachim.eastwood, LKML Back to LKML On Thu, 11 Mar 2010, akpm@linux-foundation.org wrote: Sorry, this dropped from my radar. > From: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org> > > Now that we enjoy threaded interrupts, we're starting to see irq_chip > implementations (wm831x, pca953x) that make use of threaded interrupts for > the controller, and nested interrupts for the client interrupt. It all > works very well, with one drawback: > > Drivers requesting an IRQ must now know whether the handler will run in a > thread context of not, and call request_threaded_irq() or request_irq() > accordingly. > > The problem is that the requesting driver sometimes doesn't know about the > nature of the interrupt, specially when the interrupt controller is a > discrete chip (typically a GPIO expander connected over I2C) that can be > connected to a wide variety of otherwise perfectly supported hardware. > > The following patch introduces the IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED flag, that acts as a > "contract" between the driver and the genirq framework. By using this > flag as part of the request_irq() call, the driver informs the genirq > framework that the handler will happily run either in hardirq or nested > context, without any ill effect. > > The benefit of this is a single API for drivers. It still requires the > driver to be audited, and the flag added to the request_irq() call. > > Of course, this goes against Linus choice of having separate APIs for both > cases. The only alternative I can imagine for this is to use > request_threaded_irq() with the same function provided for both the > handler and the threaded handler. Ugly... In general I have no objections, but one thing bothers me. We have no way to let a driver know whether it runs in a nested threaded context or in hard irq context. There might be (future) drivers which would be happy to know that to apply context dependent optimizations etc. What about a new function which solves your problem and returns that information ? Something along the line: int request_any_context_irq(....) { ... if (desc->status & IRQ_NESTED_THREAD) { ret = request_threaded_irq(); if (!ret) ret = IRQ_IS_NESTED; } else { ..... ret = IRQ_IS_NONTHREADED; else ret = IRQ_IS_THREADED; } ... return ret; } You get the idea, right ? It's a bit more code, but less magic and more flexible for further use cases. Thanks, tglx > This patch has been tested on ARM and Blackfin platforms. > > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org> > Tested-by: Joachim Eastwood <joachim.eastwood@jotron.com> > Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> > Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> > Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> > --- > > include/linux/interrupt.h | 3 +++ > kernel/irq/manage.c | 12 +++++++++--- > 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff -puN include/linux/interrupt.h~genirq-introduce-irqf_allow_nested-flag-for-request_irq include/linux/interrupt.h > --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h~genirq-introduce-irqf_allow_nested-flag-for-request_irq > +++ a/include/linux/interrupt.h > @@ -52,6 +52,8 @@ > * IRQF_ONESHOT - Interrupt is not reenabled after the hardirq handler finished. > * Used by threaded interrupts which need to keep the > * irq line disabled until the threaded handler has been run. > + * IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED - Handler can be either run as hardirq or nested > + * interrupt. > */ > #define IRQF_DISABLED 0x00000020 > #define IRQF_SAMPLE_RANDOM 0x00000040 > @@ -62,6 +64,7 @@ > #define IRQF_NOBALANCING 0x00000800 > #define IRQF_IRQPOLL 0x00001000 > #define IRQF_ONESHOT 0x00002000 > +#define IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED 0x00004000 > > /* > * Bits used by threaded handlers: > diff -puN kernel/irq/manage.c~genirq-introduce-irqf_allow_nested-flag-for-request_irq kernel/irq/manage.c > --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c~genirq-introduce-irqf_allow_nested-flag-for-request_irq > +++ a/kernel/irq/manage.c > @@ -641,12 +641,18 @@ __setup_irq(unsigned int irq, struct irq > > /* > * Check whether the interrupt nests into another interrupt > - * thread. > + * thread. Nested interrupt must provide a thread function > + * unless it raises the IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED flag. > */ > nested = desc->status & IRQ_NESTED_THREAD; > if (nested) { > - if (!new->thread_fn) > - return -EINVAL; > + if (!new->thread_fn) { > + if (new->flags & IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED) > + new->thread_fn = new->handler; > + else > + return -EINVAL; > + } > + > /* > * Replace the primary handler which was provided from > * the driver for non nested interrupt handling by the > _ > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 3/3] genirq: introduce IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED flag for request_irq() 2010-03-13 19:56 ` [patch 3/3] genirq: introduce IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED flag for request_irq() Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-03-16 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier 2010-03-22 6:03 ` Marc Zyngier 2010-04-13 19:33 ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: Introduce request_any_context_irq() tip-bot for Marc Zyngier 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Marc Zyngier @ 2010-03-16 8:36 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: akpm, Ingo Molnar, joachim.eastwood, LKML [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1354 bytes --] On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:56:19 +0100 (CET), Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: Hi Thomas, > In general I have no objections, but one thing bothers me. We have no > way to let a driver know whether it runs in a nested threaded context > or in hard irq context. There might be (future) drivers which would be > happy to know that to apply context dependent optimizations etc. > > What about a new function which solves your problem and returns that > information ? Something along the line: > > int request_any_context_irq(....) > { > ... > if (desc->status & IRQ_NESTED_THREAD) { > ret = request_threaded_irq(); > if (!ret) > ret = IRQ_IS_NESTED; > > } else { > ..... > ret = IRQ_IS_NONTHREADED; > else > ret = IRQ_IS_THREADED; > > } > ... > return ret; > } > > You get the idea, right ? > > It's a bit more code, but less magic and more flexible for further use > cases. What about the attached (sorry, webmail crap) patch? I deliberately left IS_THREADED out of the picture, as I have the feeling that the caller has to know if it really wants a threaded handler, and I couldn't see a way to guess its intent. Please note that this patch has only been compile-tested, as I'm traveling for the rest of the week and don't have access to my boards. Thanks, M. -- Who you jivin' with that Cosmik Debris? [-- Attachment #2: 0001-genirq-introduce-request_any_context_irq.patch --] [-- Type: text/plain, Size: 4527 bytes --] From b776526f1a0f0b3f7b2e8fd1b9cfad49985635e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org> Date: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:56:33 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] genirq: introduce request_any_context_irq() Now that we enjoy threaded interrupts, we're starting to see irq_chip implementations (wm831x, pca953x) that make use of threaded interrupts for the controller, and nested interrupts for the client interrupt. It all works very well, with one drawback: Drivers requesting an IRQ must now know whether the handler will run in a thread context of not, and call request_threaded_irq() or request_irq() accordingly. The problem is that the requesting driver sometimes doesn't know about the nature of the interrupt, specially when the interrupt controller is a discrete chip (typically a GPIO expander connected over I2C) that can be connected to a wide variety of otherwise perfectly supported hardware. This patch introduce the request_any_context_irq() function that mostly mimics the usual request_irq(), except that it checks whether the irq level is configured as nested or not, and calls the right backend. On success, it also returns either IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ or IRQC_IS_NESTED. Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org> --- include/linux/interrupt.h | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/irq/manage.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 71 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h index 75f3f00..8081e40 100644 --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h @@ -107,6 +107,16 @@ struct irqaction { extern irqreturn_t no_action(int cpl, void *dev_id); +/** + * These flags can be returned by request_any_context_irq() and + * describe the context the interrupt will be run in. + * + * IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ - interrupt runs in hardirq context + * IRQC_IS_NESTED - interrupt runs in a nested threaded context + */ +#define IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ 0x00000000 +#define IRQC_IS_NESTED 0x00000001 + #ifdef CONFIG_GENERIC_HARDIRQS extern int __must_check request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, @@ -120,6 +130,10 @@ request_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, unsigned long flags, return request_threaded_irq(irq, handler, NULL, flags, name, dev); } +extern int __must_check +request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, + unsigned long flags, const char *name, void *dev_id); + extern void exit_irq_thread(void); #else @@ -141,6 +155,18 @@ request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, return request_irq(irq, handler, flags, name, dev); } +static inline int __must_check +request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, + unsigned long flags, const char *name, void *dev_id) +{ + int ret = request_irq(irq, handler, flags, name, dev_id); + + if (!ret) + ret = IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ; + + return ret; +} + static inline void exit_irq_thread(void) { } #endif diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c index eb6078c..60b33bf 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c @@ -1088,3 +1088,48 @@ int request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, return retval; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_threaded_irq); + +/** + * request_any_context_irq - allocate an interrupt line + * @irq: Interrupt line to allocate + * @handler: Function to be called when the IRQ occurs. + * Threaded handler for threaded interrupts. + * @flags: Interrupt type flags + * @name: An ascii name for the claiming device + * @dev_id: A cookie passed back to the handler function + * + * This call allocates interrupt resources and enables the + * interrupt line and IRQ handling. It selects either a + * hardirq or threaded handling method depending on the + * context. + * + * On failure, it returns a negative value. On success, + * it returns either IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ or IRQC_IS_NESTED. + * + */ +int request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, + unsigned long flags, const char *name, void *dev_id) +{ + struct irq_desc *desc; + int ret; + + desc = irq_to_desc(irq); + if (!desc) + return -EINVAL; + + if (desc->status & IRQ_NESTED_THREAD) { + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, handler, + flags, name, dev_id); + if (!ret) + ret = IRQC_IS_NESTED; + + return ret; + } + + ret = request_irq(irq, handler, flags, name, dev_id); + if (!ret) + ret = IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ; + + return ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_any_context_irq); -- 1.7.0.2 ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 3/3] genirq: introduce IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED flag for request_irq() 2010-03-16 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier @ 2010-03-22 6:03 ` Marc Zyngier 2010-03-22 8:17 ` Thomas Gleixner 2010-04-13 19:33 ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: Introduce request_any_context_irq() tip-bot for Marc Zyngier 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Marc Zyngier @ 2010-03-22 6:03 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Zyngier; +Cc: Thomas Gleixner, akpm, Ingo Molnar, joachim.eastwood, LKML On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:36:59 +0100 Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org> wrote: > On Sat, 13 Mar 2010 20:56:19 +0100 (CET), Thomas Gleixner > <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > > Hi Thomas, > > > In general I have no objections, but one thing bothers me. We have no > > way to let a driver know whether it runs in a nested threaded context > > or in hard irq context. There might be (future) drivers which would be > > happy to know that to apply context dependent optimizations etc. > > > > What about a new function which solves your problem and returns that > > information ? Something along the line: > > > > int request_any_context_irq(....) > > { > > ... > > if (desc->status & IRQ_NESTED_THREAD) { > > ret = request_threaded_irq(); > > if (!ret) > > ret = IRQ_IS_NESTED; > > > > } else { > > ..... > > ret = IRQ_IS_NONTHREADED; > > else > > ret = IRQ_IS_THREADED; > > > > } > > ... > > return ret; > > } > > > > You get the idea, right ? > > > > It's a bit more code, but less magic and more flexible for further use > > cases. > > What about the attached (sorry, webmail crap) patch? I deliberately left > IS_THREADED out of the picture, as I have the feeling that the caller has > to know if it really wants a threaded handler, and I couldn't see a way to > guess its intent. > > Please note that this patch has only been compile-tested, as I'm traveling > for the rest of the week and don't have access to my boards. > > Thanks, > > M. Any comment on this? Thanks, M. -- I'm the slime oozin' out from your TV set... ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 3/3] genirq: introduce IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED flag for request_irq() 2010-03-22 6:03 ` Marc Zyngier @ 2010-03-22 8:17 ` Thomas Gleixner 2010-04-10 21:48 ` Trilok Soni 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-03-22 8:17 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Marc Zyngier; +Cc: akpm, Ingo Molnar, joachim.eastwood, LKML On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Marc Zyngier wrote: > > Please note that this patch has only been compile-tested, as I'm traveling > > for the rest of the week and don't have access to my boards. > > > > Thanks, > > > > M. > > Any comment on this? Yes, I was traveling last week and this is in my mail backlog :) Thanks, tglx ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [patch 3/3] genirq: introduce IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED flag for request_irq() 2010-03-22 8:17 ` Thomas Gleixner @ 2010-04-10 21:48 ` Trilok Soni 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Trilok Soni @ 2010-04-10 21:48 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Thomas Gleixner; +Cc: Marc Zyngier, akpm, Ingo Molnar, joachim.eastwood, LKML Hi , On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:17 AM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Mar 2010, Marc Zyngier wrote: >> > Please note that this patch has only been compile-tested, as I'm traveling >> > for the rest of the week and don't have access to my boards. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > >> > M. >> >> Any comment on this? > > Yes, I was traveling last week and this is in my mail backlog :) > > Thanks, Any updates on this patch? -- ---Trilok Soni http://triloksoni.wordpress.com http://www.linkedin.com/in/triloksoni ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [tip:irq/core] genirq: Introduce request_any_context_irq() 2010-03-16 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier 2010-03-22 6:03 ` Marc Zyngier @ 2010-04-13 19:33 ` tip-bot for Marc Zyngier 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: tip-bot for Marc Zyngier @ 2010-04-13 19:33 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-tip-commits; +Cc: linux-kernel, maz, hpa, mingo, joachim.eastwood, tglx Commit-ID: ae731f8d0785ccd3380f511bae888933b6562e45 Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/ae731f8d0785ccd3380f511bae888933b6562e45 Author: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org> AuthorDate: Mon, 15 Mar 2010 22:56:33 +0000 Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> CommitDate: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 16:36:39 +0200 genirq: Introduce request_any_context_irq() Now that we enjoy threaded interrupts, we're starting to see irq_chip implementations (wm831x, pca953x) that make use of threaded interrupts for the controller, and nested interrupts for the client interrupt. It all works very well, with one drawback: Drivers requesting an IRQ must now know whether the handler will run in a thread context or not, and call request_threaded_irq() or request_irq() accordingly. The problem is that the requesting driver sometimes doesn't know about the nature of the interrupt, specially when the interrupt controller is a discrete chip (typically a GPIO expander connected over I2C) that can be connected to a wide variety of otherwise perfectly supported hardware. This patch introduces the request_any_context_irq() function that mostly mimics the usual request_irq(), except that it checks whether the irq level is configured as nested or not, and calls the right backend. On success, it also returns either IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ or IRQC_IS_NESTED. [ tglx: Made return value an enum, simplified code and made the export of request_any_context_irq GPL ] Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@misterjones.org> Cc: <joachim.eastwood@jotron.com> LKML-Reference: <927ea285bd0c68934ddae1a47e44a9ba@localhost> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> --- include/linux/interrupt.h | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++ kernel/irq/manage.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 60 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/interrupt.h b/include/linux/interrupt.h index 75f3f00..d7e7a76 100644 --- a/include/linux/interrupt.h +++ b/include/linux/interrupt.h @@ -77,6 +77,18 @@ enum { IRQTF_AFFINITY, }; +/** + * These values can be returned by request_any_context_irq() and + * describe the context the interrupt will be run in. + * + * IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ - interrupt runs in hardirq context + * IRQC_IS_NESTED - interrupt runs in a nested threaded context + */ +enum { + IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ = 0, + IRQC_IS_NESTED, +}; + typedef irqreturn_t (*irq_handler_t)(int, void *); /** @@ -120,6 +132,10 @@ request_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, unsigned long flags, return request_threaded_irq(irq, handler, NULL, flags, name, dev); } +extern int __must_check +request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, + unsigned long flags, const char *name, void *dev_id); + extern void exit_irq_thread(void); #else @@ -141,6 +157,13 @@ request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, return request_irq(irq, handler, flags, name, dev); } +static inline int __must_check +request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, + unsigned long flags, const char *name, void *dev_id) +{ + return request_irq(irq, handler, flags, name, dev_id); +} + static inline void exit_irq_thread(void) { } #endif diff --git a/kernel/irq/manage.c b/kernel/irq/manage.c index 704e488..84f3227 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/manage.c +++ b/kernel/irq/manage.c @@ -1120,3 +1120,40 @@ int request_threaded_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, return retval; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(request_threaded_irq); + +/** + * request_any_context_irq - allocate an interrupt line + * @irq: Interrupt line to allocate + * @handler: Function to be called when the IRQ occurs. + * Threaded handler for threaded interrupts. + * @flags: Interrupt type flags + * @name: An ascii name for the claiming device + * @dev_id: A cookie passed back to the handler function + * + * This call allocates interrupt resources and enables the + * interrupt line and IRQ handling. It selects either a + * hardirq or threaded handling method depending on the + * context. + * + * On failure, it returns a negative value. On success, + * it returns either IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ or IRQC_IS_NESTED. + */ +int request_any_context_irq(unsigned int irq, irq_handler_t handler, + unsigned long flags, const char *name, void *dev_id) +{ + struct irq_desc *desc = irq_to_desc(irq); + int ret; + + if (!desc) + return -EINVAL; + + if (desc->status & IRQ_NESTED_THREAD) { + ret = request_threaded_irq(irq, NULL, handler, + flags, name, dev_id); + return !ret ? IRQC_IS_NESTED : ret; + } + + ret = request_irq(irq, handler, flags, name, dev_id); + return !ret ? IRQC_IS_HARDIRQ : ret; +} +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(request_any_context_irq); ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-04-13 19:34 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <201003112209.o2BM91oQ013581@imap1.linux-foundation.org>
2010-03-13 19:56 ` [patch 3/3] genirq: introduce IRQF_ALLOW_NESTED flag for request_irq() Thomas Gleixner
2010-03-16 8:36 ` Marc Zyngier
2010-03-22 6:03 ` Marc Zyngier
2010-03-22 8:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2010-04-10 21:48 ` Trilok Soni
2010-04-13 19:33 ` [tip:irq/core] genirq: Introduce request_any_context_irq() tip-bot for Marc Zyngier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox