From: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
To: Jay Vosburgh <jay.vosburgh@canonical.com>
Cc: Aahil Awatramani <aahila@google.com>,
David Dillow <dave@thedillows.org>,
Mahesh Bandewar <maheshb@google.com>,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@gmail.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <andy@greyhouse.net>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v6] bonding: Add independent control state machine
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2024 15:52:07 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92cbf512c4a1b80c577eeb25ad0d69985608e14b.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <32424.1706798605@famine>
On Thu, 2024-02-01 at 06:43 -0800, Jay Vosburgh wrote:
> Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 2024-01-29 at 20:27 +0000, Aahil Awatramani wrote:
> > > Add support for the independent control state machine per IEEE
> > > 802.1AX-2008 5.4.15 in addition to the existing implementation of the
> > > coupled control state machine.
> > >
> > > Introduces two new states, AD_MUX_COLLECTING and AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING in
> > > the LACP MUX state machine for separated handling of an initial
> > > Collecting state before the Collecting and Distributing state. This
> > > enables a port to be in a state where it can receive incoming packets
> > > while not still distributing. This is useful for reducing packet loss when
> > > a port begins distributing before its partner is able to collect.
> >
> > If I read the code correctly, the transition
> > AD_MUX_COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING -> AD_MUX_DISTRIBUTING is not possible,
> > am I correct?
>
> That's correct. There are two completely separate state
> machines in the 2008 standard, one for coupled control and one for
> independent control. The state machines utilize the same states other
> than COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING in the coupled control mode, and COLLECTING
> and DISTRIBUTING in the independent control mode.
>
> Essentially, the two machines differ in the transition out from
> ATTACHED state; coupled control moves to COLLECTING_DISTRIBUTING,
> whereas independent control moves to COLLECTING then DISTRIBUTING.
>
> The 2020 edition of the standard combines the two state machines
> into one, and changes the set of states. Bonding does not implement
> this version of the standard.
Thanks for the clarification, given that the patch LGTM!
Acked-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-01 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-29 20:27 [PATCH net-next v6] bonding: Add independent control state machine Aahil Awatramani
2024-02-01 10:15 ` Paolo Abeni
2024-02-01 14:43 ` Jay Vosburgh
2024-02-01 14:52 ` Paolo Abeni [this message]
2024-02-01 16:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-01 18:45 ` Aahil Awatramani
2024-02-02 7:17 ` Jiri Pirko
2024-02-02 17:59 ` Aahil Awatramani
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=92cbf512c4a1b80c577eeb25ad0d69985608e14b.camel@redhat.com \
--to=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=aahila@google.com \
--cc=andy@greyhouse.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=dave@thedillows.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
--cc=jay.vosburgh@canonical.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liuhangbin@gmail.com \
--cc=maheshb@google.com \
--cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox