From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B11C227584; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:04:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739811859; cv=none; b=iPPMxVYLOi93ahPMUx42Z+P6qY+p/AvOq6nUUbSUvZzJgvNjSX38B7r7m2+SgCHjWHj6+qK+xciXdKhOURaZr+lTlw0gF6/KGjdFJHt5lpG+b8KVt0p6mCutPUgyE5K29eDsZfqri8u9EQozioRKvwyx37fV1BubepTQAmM60Pc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739811859; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZmSc8mMIKJjr06qBSyOu8Bv+q9wbNq8MGVbD05+1lPY=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=lkEcuWnBAb9zg8UWmiS/hxls8DsP2+vowkW/es5HXtqVr6GsUNlqSjsD1gUqyarIy9cq9RAJ1FqWTNZ86eCAztbUSPDawC/j+MyM4OYqrVsPMFTYARsdXfHdE9PnNUqFLxqNROaCrEI76Hz3WA4bbWVH1UJdT1LacRmm+x3ufbA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=CXOJdCKY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="CXOJdCKY" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1717C4CED1; Mon, 17 Feb 2025 17:04:18 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739811859; bh=ZmSc8mMIKJjr06qBSyOu8Bv+q9wbNq8MGVbD05+1lPY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=CXOJdCKYO7gofAlxxZfu5jCtvQLV9FxxyHE/Rm/jOckfdHM3SFqi2gjbkuiXrLu4t 9oYphmjSNeURidd9NOvupQEwIYnEMUzzDBiaAbd919xQuNGFnIziiTNrjWFzv9jip3 cu2N4m7TWYtOvqsBu3ZjF27if1M8/lX47DaAswJa70wsmNimEB+yixKmJ+Iuy3Fc35 aT0NMHstZlonF7kPggT/CU3/UAsV02PYyCzbrgyxXKJYpyJ87WvlXk6qCPBDoVup21 jw8WCSArzrFwV6YzhCeZBJDxEu6GGefEObi64RzmZGsXwbsHq+U/vtGhWWYVp6vBuD n972U7crVhqjw== Message-ID: <92da3765-def8-4164-b667-8caaba01706c@kernel.org> Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 11:04:17 -0600 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 09/17] cpufreq/amd-pstate-ut: Continue on missing policies To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" Cc: Perry Yuan , Dhananjay Ugwekar , "open list:X86 ARCHITECTURE (32-BIT AND 64-BIT)" , "open list:CPU FREQUENCY SCALING FRAMEWORK" , Mario Limonciello References: <20250215005244.1212285-1-superm1@kernel.org> <20250215005244.1212285-10-superm1@kernel.org> Content-Language: en-US From: Mario Limonciello In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 2/17/2025 05:38, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote: > On Fri, Feb 14, 2025 at 06:52:36PM -0600, Mario Limonciello wrote: >> From: Mario Limonciello >> >> If a CPU is missing a policy then the unit test is skipped for the rest >> of the CPUs on the system. >> >> Instead just skip the rest of that test and continue to test the rest >> of them. > > Along with this change, does it make sense to only loop over the > online CPUs instead of possible CPUs ? > > Sure thing. Will change this patch for v3. Thanks!