From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NIC recommendations (was Re: Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4...)
Date: 1 Jan 2001 15:51:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <92r55i$h7o$1@cesium.transmeta.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3A4DBC02.92C0FD9A@uow.edu.au> <200012302301.eBUN1IF01354@pobox.com>
Followup to: <200012302301.eBUN1IF01354@pobox.com>
By author: "Barry K. Nathan" <barryn@pobox.com>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> In any case, tulips have been more problematic for me than 8139, pcnet32,
> or 3c905c (whose reliability are all comparable IME). I've never tried
> eepro100, though. (Also, I'm speaking in terms of my experiences across
> all OS's which I've used the cards under, not just under Linux, although
> my Linux experiences are similar to the experiences I've had overall.)
>
I have used eepro100's on *a lot* of boxes, including *.kernel.org;
haven't had any problems whatsoever any time recently.
-hpa
--
<hpa@transmeta.com> at work, <hpa@zytor.com> in private!
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-02 0:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-28 22:11 Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4 nfsd Oops rears it head again Mike Elmore
2000-12-28 21:59 ` David S. Miller
2000-12-29 3:21 ` Mike Elmore
2000-12-29 3:47 ` Chris Wedgwood
2000-12-29 6:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2000-12-29 10:25 ` Chris Wedgwood
2000-12-30 10:42 ` Andrew Morton
2000-12-30 18:06 ` Francois Romieu
2000-12-30 23:01 ` NIC recommendations (was Re: Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4...) Barry K. Nathan
2001-01-01 23:51 ` H. Peter Anvin [this message]
2000-12-29 8:14 ` Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4 nfsd Oops rears it head again David Ford
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='92r55i$h7o$1@cesium.transmeta.com' \
--to=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox