From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Mon, 1 Jan 2001 19:22:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Mon, 1 Jan 2001 19:22:14 -0500 Received: from neon-gw.transmeta.com ([209.10.217.66]:14345 "EHLO neon-gw.transmeta.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Mon, 1 Jan 2001 19:22:07 -0500 To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: "H. Peter Anvin" Subject: Re: NIC recommendations (was Re: Repeatable 2.4.0-test13-pre4...) Date: 1 Jan 2001 15:51:14 -0800 Organization: Transmeta Corporation, Santa Clara CA Message-ID: <92r55i$h7o$1@cesium.transmeta.com> In-Reply-To: <3A4DBC02.92C0FD9A@uow.edu.au> <200012302301.eBUN1IF01354@pobox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Disclaimer: Not speaking for Transmeta in any way, shape, or form. Copyright: Copyright 2001 H. Peter Anvin - All Rights Reserved Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Followup to: <200012302301.eBUN1IF01354@pobox.com> By author: "Barry K. Nathan" In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel > > In any case, tulips have been more problematic for me than 8139, pcnet32, > or 3c905c (whose reliability are all comparable IME). I've never tried > eepro100, though. (Also, I'm speaking in terms of my experiences across > all OS's which I've used the cards under, not just under Linux, although > my Linux experiences are similar to the experiences I've had overall.) > I have used eepro100's on *a lot* of boxes, including *.kernel.org; haven't had any problems whatsoever any time recently. -hpa -- at work, in private! "Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot." http://www.zytor.com/~hpa/puzzle.txt - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/