RE: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices

zhuweixi
2023-12-01T02:47:06Z

Thanks! I am planning to present GMEM in Linux MM Alignment Sessions so I can collect more input from the mm developers.

@Christian @Oak I will also send you invitations once a presentation is scheduled. :)

-Weixi

-----Original Message-----
From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Sent: Thursday, November 30, 2023 10:55 PM
To: zhuweixi <weixi.zhu@huawei.com>; Dave Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>; Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; akpm@linux-foundation.org; weixi.zhu@openeuler.sh; mgorman@suse.de; jglisse@redhat.com; rcampbell@nvidia.com; jhubbard@nvidia.com; apopple@nvidia.com; mhairgrove@nvidia.com; ziy@nvidia.com; alexander.deucher@amd.com; Xinhui.Pan@amd.com; amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; Felix.Kuehling@amd.com; ogabbay@kernel.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org; jgg@nvidia.com; leonro@nvidia.com; zhenyuw@linux.intel.com; zhi.a.wang@intel.com; intel-gvt-dev@lists.freedesktop.org; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; jani.nikula@linux.intel.com; joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com; rodrigo.vivi@intel.com; tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/6] Supporting GMEM (generalized memory management) for external memory devices

On 29.11.23 09:27, zhuweixi wrote:
> Glad to hear that more sharable code is desirable.
> IMHO, for a common MM subsystem, it is more beneficial for GMEM to
> extend core MM instead of building a separate one.

More core-mm complexity, awesome, we all love that! ;)

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb