From: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
To: Xianting Tian <xianting_tian@126.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org, agk@redhat.com, snitzer@redhat.com,
kent.overstreet@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-raid@vger.kernel.org,
Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com>,
song@kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] md: use BLK_STS_OK instead of hardcode
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2021 00:10:23 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <930e7a23-a22e-409f-e058-0b1576c5d9d0@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1624377241-8642-1-git-send-email-xianting_tian@126.com>
On 6/22/21 11:54 PM, Xianting Tian wrote:
> When setting io status, sometimes it uses BLK_STS_*, sometimes,
> it uses hardcode 0.
> Use the macro to replace hardcode in multiple places.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xianting Tian <xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/bcache/request.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/dm-clone-target.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/dm-integrity.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/dm-mpath.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/dm-raid1.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/dm.c | 2 +-
> drivers/md/raid1.c | 4 ++--
> drivers/md/raid10.c | 2 +-
> 8 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> index 6d1de88..73ba5a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/bcache/request.c
> @@ -790,7 +790,7 @@ static void cached_dev_read_error(struct closure *cl)
> /* Retry from the backing device: */
> trace_bcache_read_retry(s->orig_bio);
>
> - s->iop.status = 0;
> + s->iop.status = BLK_STS_OK;
> do_bio_hook(s, s->orig_bio, backing_request_endio);
>
> /* XXX: invalidate cache */
Hi Xianting,
NACK for bcache part.
The change is incomplete, if you want to replace 0 by BLK_STS_OK, you
should check all locations
where s->iop.status is checked and replace with BLK_STS_OK when necessary.
One but not the only one example is,
871 if (s->iop.status)
872 continue_at_nobarrier(cl, cached_dev_read_error,
bcache_wq);
Maybe you should change to
if (s->iop.status != BLK_STS_OK)
continue_at_nobarrier(cl, cached_dev_read_error,
bcache_wq);
Just FYI.
Coly Li
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-06-22 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-06-22 15:54 [PATCH] md: use BLK_STS_OK instead of hardcode Xianting Tian
2021-06-22 16:10 ` Coly Li [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=930e7a23-a22e-409f-e058-0b1576c5d9d0@suse.de \
--to=colyli@suse.de \
--cc=agk@redhat.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=kent.overstreet@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=snitzer@redhat.com \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=xianting.tian@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=xianting_tian@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).