From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762377Ab2DLJgS (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:36:18 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:8548 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755523Ab2DLJgR (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Apr 2012 05:36:17 -0400 Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20120412024810.GA17984@redhat.com> References: <20120412024810.GA17984@redhat.com> <20120412024751.GA17561@redhat.com> To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , David Smith , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Larry Woodman , Peter Zijlstra , Tejun Heo , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, geert@linux-m68k.org, chris@zankel.net Subject: TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME [was Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] task_work_queue: add generic process-context callbacks] Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2012 10:35:42 +0100 Message-ID: <9335.1334223342@redhat.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Oleg Nesterov wrote: > +#ifdef TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME If we're going to keep this feature, I wonder if it's worth just requiring the arches lacking this feature to add it at this point, rather than adding all this conditional logic. It doesn't look like it should be too hard for m68k, but xtensa looks tricky. David