public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@intel.com>
To: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
	H Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com>, Babu Moger <Babu.Moger@amd.com>,
	<shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	D Scott Phillips OS <scott@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	<lcherian@marvell.com>, <bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>,
	<tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>, Jamie Iles <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
	Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	"Xin Hao" <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>, <xingxin.hx@openanolis.org>,
	<baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/21] x86/resctrl: Switch over to the resctrl mbps_val list
Date: Tue, 17 May 2022 09:19:21 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <93459560-0740-57f3-ed15-caae370aa80a@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220412124419.30689-9-james.morse@arm.com>

Hi James,

On 4/12/2022 5:44 AM, James Morse wrote:
> Updates to resctrl's software controller follow the same path as
> other configuration updates, but they don't modify the hardware state.
> rdtgroup_schemata_write() uses parse_line() and the resource's
> parse_ctrlval() function to stage the configuration.
> resctrl_arch_update_domains() then updates the mbps_val[] array
> instead, and resctrl_arch_update_domains() skips the rdt_ctrl_update()
> call that would update hardware.
> 
> This complicates the interface between resctrl's filesystem parts
> and architecture specific code. It should be possible for mba_sc
> to be completely implemented by the filesystem parts of resctrl. This
> would allow it to work on a second architecture with no additional code.
> resctrl_arch_update_domains() using the mbps_val[] array prevents this.
> 
> Change parse_bw() to write the configuration value directly to the
> mbps_val[] array in the domain structure. Change rdtgroup_schemata_write()
> to skip the call to resctrl_arch_update_domains(), meaning all the
> mba_sc specific code in resctrl_arch_update_domains() can be removed.
> On the read-side, show_doms() and update_mba_bw() are changed to read
> the mbps_val[] array from the domain structure. With this,
> resctrl_arch_get_config() no longer needs to consider mba_sc resources.
> 

This sounds like a good cleanup and I understand it to not intend 
functional change, so a bit more information is needed on the change
in rdtgroup_init_alloc(). More below.

> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> index 497cadf3285d..5cc1e6b229d4 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/monitor.c
> @@ -447,13 +447,11 @@ static void update_mba_bw(struct rdtgroup *rgrp, struct rdt_domain *dom_mbm)
>  	hw_dom_mba = resctrl_to_arch_dom(dom_mba);
>  
>  	cur_bw = pmbm_data->prev_bw;
> -	user_bw = resctrl_arch_get_config(r_mba, dom_mba, closid, CDP_NONE);
> +	user_bw = dom_mba->mbps_val[closid];
>  	delta_bw = pmbm_data->delta_bw;
> -	/*
> -	 * resctrl_arch_get_config() chooses the mbps/ctrl value to return
> -	 * based on is_mba_sc(). For now, reach into the hw_dom.
> -	 */
> -	cur_msr_val = hw_dom_mba->ctrl_val[closid];
> +
> +	/* MBA monitor resource doesn't support CDP */

MBA resource does not support monitoring. Perhaps instead:
/* MBA resource doesn't support CDP. */

> +	cur_msr_val = resctrl_arch_get_config(r_mba, dom_mba, closid, CDP_NONE);
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * For Ctrl groups read data from child monitor groups.
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> index 9d5be6a73644..07904308245c 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
> @@ -1356,11 +1356,13 @@ static int rdtgroup_size_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  			      struct seq_file *s, void *v)
>  {
>  	struct resctrl_schema *schema;
> +	enum resctrl_conf_type type;
>  	struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp;
>  	struct rdt_resource *r;
>  	struct rdt_domain *d;
>  	unsigned int size;
>  	int ret = 0;
> +	u32 closid;
>  	bool sep;
>  	u32 ctrl;
>  
> @@ -1386,8 +1388,11 @@ static int rdtgroup_size_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> +	closid = rdtgrp->closid;
> +
>  	list_for_each_entry(schema, &resctrl_schema_all, list) {
>  		r = schema->res;
> +		type = schema->conf_type;
>  		sep = false;
>  		seq_printf(s, "%*s:", max_name_width, schema->name);
>  		list_for_each_entry(d, &r->domains, list) {
> @@ -1396,9 +1401,12 @@ static int rdtgroup_size_show(struct kernfs_open_file *of,
>  			if (rdtgrp->mode == RDT_MODE_PSEUDO_LOCKSETUP) {
>  				size = 0;
>  			} else {
> -				ctrl = resctrl_arch_get_config(r, d,
> -							       rdtgrp->closid,
> -							       schema->conf_type);
> +				if (is_mba_sc(r))
> +					ctrl = d->mbps_val[closid];
> +				else
> +					ctrl = resctrl_arch_get_config(r, d,
> +								       closid,
> +								       type);
>  				if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_MBA)
>  					size = ctrl;
>  				else
> @@ -1922,9 +1930,6 @@ static void mba_sc_domain_destroy(struct rdt_resource *r,
>  static int set_mba_sc(bool mba_sc)
>  {
>  	struct rdt_resource *r = &rdt_resources_all[RDT_RESOURCE_MBA].r_resctrl;
> -	u32 num_closid = resctrl_arch_get_num_closid(r);
> -	struct rdt_domain *d;
> -	int i;
>  
>  	if (!is_mbm_enabled() || !is_mba_linear() ||
>  	    mba_sc == is_mba_sc(r))
> @@ -1932,11 +1937,6 @@ static int set_mba_sc(bool mba_sc)
>  
>  	r->membw.mba_sc = mba_sc;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(d, &r->domains, list) {
> -		for (i = 0; i < num_closid; i++)
> -			d->mbps_val[i] = MBA_MAX_MBPS;
> -	}
> -
>  	return 0;
>  }

With this removed, where is rdt_domain->mbps_val reset on remount of resctrl?

>  
> @@ -2809,15 +2809,18 @@ static int rdtgroup_init_cat(struct resctrl_schema *s, u32 closid)
>  }
>  
>  /* Initialize MBA resource with default values. */
> -static void rdtgroup_init_mba(struct rdt_resource *r)
> +static void rdtgroup_init_mba(struct rdt_resource *r, u32 closid)
>  {
>  	struct resctrl_staged_config *cfg;
>  	struct rdt_domain *d;
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(d, &r->domains, list) {
>  		cfg = &d->staged_config[CDP_NONE];
> -		cfg->new_ctrl = is_mba_sc(r) ? MBA_MAX_MBPS : r->default_ctrl;
> +		cfg->new_ctrl = r->default_ctrl;
>  		cfg->have_new_ctrl = true;
> +
> +		if (is_mba_sc(r))
> +			d->mbps_val[closid] = MBA_MAX_MBPS;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -2831,7 +2834,7 @@ static int rdtgroup_init_alloc(struct rdtgroup *rdtgrp)
>  	list_for_each_entry(s, &resctrl_schema_all, list) {
>  		r = s->res;
>  		if (r->rid == RDT_RESOURCE_MBA) {
> -			rdtgroup_init_mba(r);
> +			rdtgroup_init_mba(r, rdtgrp->closid);
>  		} else {
>  			ret = rdtgroup_init_cat(s, rdtgrp->closid);
>  			if (ret < 0)

What follows this hunk and continues to be called is:

	ret = resctrl_arch_update_domains(r, rdtgrp->closid);

before this patch resctrl_arch_update_domains() would just have updated
the mbps_val but not made any configuration changed if is_mba_sc() is true.
Before this patch configuration changes done in
resctrl_arch_update_domains() is omitted when is_mba_sc() is true
but after earlier change in this patch it proceeds and will result in
configuration change.

Reinette

  reply	other threads:[~2022-05-17 16:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-12 12:43 [PATCH v4 00/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2022-04-12 12:43 ` [PATCH v4 01/21] x86/resctrl: Kill off alloc_enabled James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 02/21] x86/resctrl: Merge mon_capable and mon_enabled James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 03/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain online callback for resctrl work James Morse
     [not found]   ` <3acfb11b-eba2-3eb0-94d1-d24a24d03d1f@linux.alibaba.com>
2022-05-03  7:59     ` Xin Hao
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 04/21] x86/resctrl: Group struct rdt_hw_domain cleanup James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 05/21] x86/resctrl: Add domain offline callback for resctrl work James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 06/21] x86/resctrl: Remove set_mba_sc()s control array re-initialisation James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 07/21] x86/resctrl: Create mba_sc configuration in the rdt_domain James Morse
2022-05-17 16:18   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-06-07 12:07     ` James Morse
2022-05-18 16:06   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 08/21] x86/resctrl: Switch over to the resctrl mbps_val list James Morse
2022-05-17 16:19   ` Reinette Chatre [this message]
2022-06-07 12:07     ` James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 09/21] x86/resctrl: Remove architecture copy of mbps_val James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 10/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract and use supports_mba_mbps() James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 11/21] x86/resctrl: Allow update_mba_bw() to update controls directly James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 12/21] x86/resctrl: Calculate bandwidth from the previous __mon_event_count() chunks James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 13/21] x86/resctrl: Add per-rmid arch private storage for overflow and chunks James Morse
2022-05-18 16:06   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 14/21] x86/resctrl: Allow per-rmid arch private storage to be reset James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 15/21] x86/resctrl: Abstract __rmid_read() James Morse
2022-05-17 21:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-06-07 12:07     ` James Morse
2022-06-07 15:51       ` Reinette Chatre
2022-06-07 20:44   ` Fenghua Yu
2022-06-07 21:25   ` Fenghua Yu
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 16/21] x86/resctrl: Pass the required parameters into resctrl_arch_rmid_read() James Morse
2022-06-07 21:07   ` Fenghua Yu
2022-06-22 15:16     ` James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 17/21] x86/resctrl: Move mbm_overflow_count() " James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 18/21] x86/resctrl: Move get_corrected_mbm_count() " James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 19/21] x86/resctrl: Rename and change the units of resctrl_cqm_threshold James Morse
2022-05-17 21:23   ` Reinette Chatre
2022-06-07 22:08   ` Fenghua Yu
2022-06-22 15:16     ` James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 20/21] x86/resctrl: Add resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit to abstract x86's boot_cpu_data James Morse
2022-04-12 12:44 ` [PATCH v4 21/21] x86/resctrl: Make resctrl_arch_rmid_read() return values in bytes James Morse
2022-04-18  8:09 ` [PATCH v4 00/21] " tan.shaopeng

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=93459560-0740-57f3-ed15-caae370aa80a@intel.com \
    --to=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
    --cc=Babu.Moger@amd.com \
    --cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
    --cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=xingxin.hx@openanolis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox