From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@pengutronix.de>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance
Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2019 13:08:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9351473.C2nPJoyFsE@aspire.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5510642.nRbR3bcduN@aspire.rjw.lan>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
If a stateless device link to a certain supplier with
DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME set in the flags is added and then removed by the
consumer driver's probe callback, the supplier's PM-runtime usage
counter will be nonzero after that which effectively causes the
supplier to remain "always on" going forward.
Namely, device_link_add() called to add the link invokes
device_link_rpm_prepare() which notices that the consumer driver is
probing, so it increments the supplier's PM-runtime usage counter
with the assumption that the link will stay around until
pm_runtime_put_suppliers() is called by driver_probe_device(),
but if the link goes away before that point, the supplier's
PM-runtime usage counter will remain nonzero.
To prevent that from happening, first rework pm_runtime_get_suppliers()
and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() to use the rpm_active refounts of device
links and make the latter only drop rpm_active and the supplier's
PM-runtime usage counter for each link by one, unless rpm_active is
one already for it. Next, modify device_link_add() to bump up the
new link's rpm_active refcount and the suppliers PM-runtime usage
counter by two, to prevent pm_runtime_put_suppliers(), if it is
called subsequently, from suspending the supplier prematurely (in
case its PM-runtime usage counter goes down to 0 in there).
Due to the way rpm_put_suppliers() works, this change does not
affect runtime suspend of the consumer ends of new device links (or,
generally, device links for which DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME has just been
set).
Fixes: e2f3cd831a28 ("driver core: Fix handling of runtime PM flags in device_link_add()")
Reported-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
Note that the issue had been there before commit e2f3cd831a28, but it was
overlooked by that commit and this change is a fix on top of it, so make
the Fixes: tag point to commit e2f3cd831a28 (instead of an earlier one
that the patch will not be applicable to).
---
drivers/base/core.c | 21 ++++-----------------
drivers/base/power/runtime.c | 27 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/pm_runtime.h | 4 ++++
3 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/base/power/runtime.c
@@ -1655,8 +1655,10 @@ void pm_runtime_get_suppliers(struct dev
idx = device_links_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node)
- if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)
+ if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME) {
+ refcount_inc(&link->rpm_active);
pm_runtime_get_sync(link->supplier);
+ }
device_links_read_unlock(idx);
}
@@ -1673,7 +1675,8 @@ void pm_runtime_put_suppliers(struct dev
idx = device_links_read_lock();
list_for_each_entry_rcu(link, &dev->links.suppliers, c_node)
- if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)
+ if (link->flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME &&
+ refcount_dec_not_one(&link->rpm_active))
pm_runtime_put(link->supplier);
device_links_read_unlock(idx);
@@ -1686,6 +1689,26 @@ void pm_runtime_new_link(struct device *
spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
}
+/**
+ * pm_runtime_active_link - Set up new device link as active for PM-runtime.
+ * @link: Device link to be set up as active.
+ * @supplier: Supplier end of the link.
+ *
+ * Add 2 to the rpm_active refcount of @link and increment the PM-runtime
+ * usage counter of @supplier once more in case the link is being added while
+ * the consumer driver is probing and pm_runtime_put_suppliers() will be called
+ * subsequently.
+ *
+ * Note that this doesn't prevent rpm_put_suppliers() from decreasing the link's
+ * rpm_active refcount down to one, so runtime suspend of the consumer end of
+ * @link is not affected.
+ */
+void pm_runtime_active_link(struct device_link *link, struct device *supplier)
+{
+ refcount_add(2, &link->rpm_active);
+ pm_runtime_get_noresume(supplier);
+}
+
void pm_runtime_drop_link(struct device *dev)
{
spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
Index: linux-pm/drivers/base/core.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/base/core.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -165,19 +165,6 @@ void device_pm_move_to_tail(struct devic
device_links_read_unlock(idx);
}
-static void device_link_rpm_prepare(struct device *consumer,
- struct device *supplier)
-{
- pm_runtime_new_link(consumer);
- /*
- * If the link is being added by the consumer driver at probe time,
- * balance the decrementation of the supplier's runtime PM usage counter
- * after consumer probe in driver_probe_device().
- */
- if (consumer->links.status == DL_DEV_PROBING)
- pm_runtime_get_noresume(supplier);
-}
-
/**
* device_link_add - Create a link between two devices.
* @consumer: Consumer end of the link.
@@ -286,11 +273,11 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(stru
if (flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME) {
if (!(link->flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME)) {
- device_link_rpm_prepare(consumer, supplier);
+ pm_runtime_new_link(consumer);
link->flags |= DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME;
}
if (flags & DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE)
- refcount_inc(&link->rpm_active);
+ pm_runtime_active_link(link, supplier);
}
if (flags & DL_FLAG_STATELESS) {
@@ -323,9 +310,9 @@ struct device_link *device_link_add(stru
if (flags & DL_FLAG_PM_RUNTIME) {
if (flags & DL_FLAG_RPM_ACTIVE)
- refcount_inc(&link->rpm_active);
+ pm_runtime_active_link(link, supplier);
- device_link_rpm_prepare(consumer, supplier);
+ pm_runtime_new_link(consumer);
}
get_device(supplier);
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/pm_runtime.h
@@ -59,6 +59,8 @@ extern void pm_runtime_clean_up_links(st
extern void pm_runtime_get_suppliers(struct device *dev);
extern void pm_runtime_put_suppliers(struct device *dev);
extern void pm_runtime_new_link(struct device *dev);
+extern void pm_runtime_active_link(struct device_link *link,
+ struct device *supplier);
extern void pm_runtime_drop_link(struct device *dev);
static inline void pm_suspend_ignore_children(struct device *dev, bool enable)
@@ -178,6 +180,8 @@ static inline void pm_runtime_clean_up_l
static inline void pm_runtime_get_suppliers(struct device *dev) {}
static inline void pm_runtime_put_suppliers(struct device *dev) {}
static inline void pm_runtime_new_link(struct device *dev) {}
+static inline void pm_runtime_active_link(struct device_link *link,
+ struct device *supplier) {}
static inline void pm_runtime_drop_link(struct device *dev) {}
#endif /* !CONFIG_PM */
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-12 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-12 12:01 [PATCH 0/2] driver core: Fixes related to device links Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 12:04 ` [PATCH 1/2] PM-runtime: Fix __pm_runtime_set_status() race with runtime resume Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 16:17 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-12 16:28 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 18:27 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-12 19:05 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 20:14 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-12 12:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2019-02-12 21:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] driver core: Fix possible supplier PM-usage counter imbalance Ulf Hansson
2019-02-12 22:08 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-15 11:00 ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-15 11:57 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-15 12:06 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-15 13:21 ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-15 14:14 ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-15 14:37 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-15 16:44 ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-17 21:33 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-18 12:12 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-18 13:02 ` Jon Hunter
2019-02-18 22:14 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 14:09 ` [PATCH 0/2] driver core: Fixes related to device links Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-12 14:52 ` Ulf Hansson
2019-02-12 15:04 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2019-02-12 15:06 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2019-02-12 16:20 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9351473.C2nPJoyFsE@aspire.rjw.lan \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=a.hajda@samsung.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=l.stach@pengutronix.de \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox