From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: "Tian, Kevin" <kevin.tian@intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@linaro.org>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: baolu.lu@linux.intel.com, "Liu, Yi L" <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com>,
"iommu@lists.linux.dev" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu: Make single-device group for PASID explicit
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2023 14:36:40 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <93811e0c-ff04-366d-493e-7186e4588359@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BN9PR11MB5276EBE5788713FBA99332F88C1EA@BN9PR11MB5276.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On 2023/8/21 14:33, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>> From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 1:45 PM
>>
>> On 2023/8/18 11:56, Tian, Kevin wrote:
>>>> From: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> Sent: Monday, August 14, 2023 9:18 AM
>>>>
>>>> The PASID interfaces have always supported only single-device groups.
>>>> This was first introduced in commit 26b25a2b98e45 ("iommu: Bind
>> process
>>>> address spaces to devices"), and has been kept consistent in subsequent
>>>> commits.
>>>>
>>>> However, the core code doesn't explicitly check for this requirement
>>>> after commit 201007ef707a8 ("PCI: Enable PASID only when ACS RR & UF
>>>> enabled on upstream path"), which made this requirement implicit.
>>>>
>>>> Restore the check to make it explicit that the PASID interfaces only
>>>> support devices belonging to single-device groups.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 5 +++++
>>>> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>>> index 71b9c41f2a9e..f1eba60e573f 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
>>>> @@ -3408,6 +3408,11 @@ int iommu_attach_device_pasid(struct
>>>> iommu_domain *domain,
>>>> return -ENODEV;
>>>>
>>>> mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
>>>> + if (list_count_nodes(&group->devices) != 1) {
>>>> + ret = -EINVAL;
>>>> + goto out_unlock;
>>>> + }
>>>> +
>>>
>>> I wonder whether we should also block adding new device to this
>>> group once the single-device has pasid enabled. Otherwise the
>>
>> This has been guaranteed by pci_enable_pasid():
>>
>> if (!pci_acs_path_enabled(pdev, NULL, PCI_ACS_RR | PCI_ACS_UF))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>
> well since you are adding generic core check then it's not good to
> rely on the fact of a specific bus...
We attempted to do this in the patch linked below.
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/20220705050710.2887204-5-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com/
After long discussion, we decided to move it to the pci_enable_pasid()
interface. The non-static single device group is only relevant to PCI
fabrics that support hot-plugging without ACS support on the upstream
path.
Best regards,
baolu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-22 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-14 1:17 [PATCH v2 0/3] iommu: Make pasid array per device Lu Baolu
2023-08-14 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] iommu: Make single-device group for PASID explicit Lu Baolu
2023-08-18 3:56 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-08-21 5:44 ` Baolu Lu
2023-08-21 6:33 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-08-22 6:36 ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2023-08-22 8:24 ` Tian, Kevin
2023-08-22 13:51 ` Baolu Lu
2023-08-14 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] iommu: Consolidate pasid dma ownership check Lu Baolu
2023-08-18 5:43 ` Nicolin Chen
2023-08-21 5:46 ` Baolu Lu
2023-08-14 1:17 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] iommu: Move pasid array from group to device Lu Baolu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=93811e0c-ff04-366d-493e-7186e4588359@linux.intel.com \
--to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jacob.jun.pan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox