From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:44:55 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:44:45 -0500 Received: from enterprise.cistron.net ([195.64.68.33]:49169 "EHLO enterprise.cistron.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Sun, 7 Jan 2001 11:44:27 -0500 From: miquels@traveler.cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) Subject: Re: [PATCH] hashed device lookup (Does NOT meet Linus' sumission Date: 7 Jan 2001 16:44:37 GMT Organization: Cistron Internet Services B.V. Message-ID: <93a6dl$6oj$1@enterprise.cistron.net> In-Reply-To: <3A580B31.7998C783@candelatech.com> X-Trace: enterprise.cistron.net 978885877 6931 195.64.65.67 (7 Jan 2001 16:44:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@cistron.nl X-Newsreader: trn 4.0-test74 (May 26, 2000) Originator: miquels@traveler.cistron-office.nl (Miquel van Smoorenburg) To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org In article , Alan Cox wrote: >At this point you have to ask 'why is vlan4001 an interface'. Would it not >be cleaner to add the vlan id to the entries in the list of addresses per >interface ? Not all the world is IP - what if you want to bridge between an ATM ELAN (LANE) and a VLAN? Note that different ATM ELANs also show up as seperate interfaces. Mike. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/