From: "Martin J. Bligh" <mbligh@aracnet.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@transmeta.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@pobox.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@digeo.com>,
rml@tech9.net,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3
Date: Thu, 06 Mar 2003 10:13:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9420000.1046974427@flay> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303061900230.16118-100000@localhost.localdomain>
>> But the proof is in the pudding. Does this actually make things appear
>> "nicer" to people? Or is it just another wanking session?
>
> yes, it would be interesting to see Andrew's experiments redone for the
> following combinations:
>
> - your patch
> - my patch
> - both patches
>
> in fact my patch was tested and it mostly solved the problem for Andrew,
> but i'm now convinced that the combination of patches will be the real
> solution for this class of problems - as that will attack _both_ ends,
> both CPU hogs are recognized better, and interactivity detection
> interactivity-distribution is improved.
It would be nice if we had a "batch-job-able" simulation of this situation,
to do more accurate testing with ... can anyone think of an easy way to
do such a thing? "waggle a few windows around on X and see if it feels
better to you or not" is kind of hard to do accurate testing with.
Of course, the simulation has to be accurate too, or it gets stupid ;-)
M.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-03-06 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-28 9:50 [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 Ingo Molnar
2003-02-28 21:12 ` Andrew Morton
2003-02-28 21:23 ` Robert Love
2003-03-01 4:25 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-06 3:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 7:45 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-06 7:47 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 15:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 16:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 17:03 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 17:24 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 17:54 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 18:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 18:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 17:55 ` John Levon
2003-03-06 18:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 18:11 ` John Levon
2003-03-06 18:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 18:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 18:10 ` David S. Miller
2003-03-06 18:18 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 5:57 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 5:54 ` Shawn
2003-03-07 6:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 14:28 ` jlnance
2003-03-07 6:45 ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-03-07 6:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 7:00 ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-03-07 7:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-08 18:28 ` Aaron Lehmann
2003-03-07 7:00 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-07 3:19 ` Horst von Brand
2003-03-06 15:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 16:01 ` Jeff Garzik
2003-03-06 16:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 17:11 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 17:52 ` jvlists
2003-03-06 18:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 8:15 ` Xavier Bestel
2003-03-06 23:18 ` Robert Love
2003-03-06 18:49 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-06 17:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 18:04 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 18:13 ` Martin J. Bligh [this message]
2003-03-06 18:26 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-08 0:05 ` Daniel Phillips
2003-03-06 17:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 17:17 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 18:06 ` Dimitrie O. Paun
2003-03-06 22:14 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-06 22:31 ` Dimitrie O. Paun
2003-03-06 23:05 ` Robert Love
2003-03-06 23:33 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-06 18:25 ` Alan Cox
2003-03-06 17:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 22:30 ` Eric Northup
2003-03-06 23:40 ` Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-07 0:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-07 0:09 ` Dimitrie O. Paun
2003-03-06 22:00 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-03-06 17:13 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 17:30 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 17:33 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 17:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 18:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2003-03-06 20:42 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-06 22:18 ` Robert Love
2003-03-07 5:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 5:51 ` Shawn
2003-03-07 6:01 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 6:07 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-07 6:15 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 10:19 ` Helge Hafting
2003-03-07 11:06 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 7:45 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 7:45 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303070842420.4572-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-07 8:09 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 8:10 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-07 8:26 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 8:15 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303070913370.5173-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-07 8:34 ` Mike Galbraith
2003-03-07 8:31 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 22:03 ` Martin Waitz
2003-03-06 22:07 ` Robert Love
2003-03-06 22:35 ` Martin Waitz
2003-03-06 22:56 ` Robert Love
2003-03-06 23:27 ` Martin Waitz
2003-03-06 23:36 ` Robert Love
2003-03-07 10:39 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-07 10:27 ` Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 6:58 ` [patch] "interactivity changes", sched-2.5.64-A4 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 10:00 ` Andrew Morton
2003-03-06 10:07 ` [patch] "interactivity changes", sched-2.5.64-A5 Ingo Molnar
2003-03-06 10:16 ` [patch] "HT scheduler", sched-2.5.63-B3 Chris Wedgwood
2003-03-06 10:18 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] <5.2.0.9.2.20030307093435.01a8fe88@pop.gmx.net>
2003-03-07 9:30 ` Ingo Molnar
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.4.44.0303071003060.6318-100000@localhost.localdom ain>
2003-03-07 9:38 ` Mike Galbraith
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-10 19:53 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9420000.1046974427@flay \
--to=mbligh@aracnet.com \
--cc=akpm@digeo.com \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=jgarzik@pobox.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=rml@tech9.net \
--cc=torvalds@transmeta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox